segunda-feira, 10 de setembro de 2018

Analysis: Yes, President Trump gets credit for the economy




JOIN: 





SOURCE/LINK: https://www.npr.org/2018/04/01/598525147/what-a-booming-economy-means-for-the-midterms

Politics 


What A Booming Economy Means For The Midterms

April 1, 20187:00 AM ET
President Trump boasted about economic gains under his presidency on Thursday, during a rally at a facility of the Operating Engineers Apprentice and Training, in Richfield, Ohio.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images
Despite a wave of controversies, President Trump's popularity seems to be rising ever so slightly, according to a couple of recent polls. The bump may be linked to the fact that more Americans seem to be crediting Trump for the nation's healthy economy. And that has raised one of the central questions of the midterm election season: whether the economy will help keep Republicans in control.
Voters like Allen Cowan, a 50-year-old from West Virginia, might offer some clues. Cowan considers himself a socially liberal, fiscally conservative voter, the type of voter who reluctantly chose Donald Trump in 2016.
"I held my nose at the voting booth," Cowan said. But, these days he's satisfied with at least one aspect of the Trump era.
"Financially speaking, I cannot complain," he said. "My retirement I have through my employer has shown a remarkable increase."
Still, neither Cowan's personal finances nor the economic health of the country have changed his overall opinion of the president.
"I can look at President Trump and be like 'OK, his policies in regards to the economy and stuff are good for the nation.' But I'm still going to think President Trump — the whole kit and caboodle — is a bitter pill to swallow," he said.


And Cowan is not alone.
Trump's average approval rating is around 41 percent, which is not as high as you would expect, given the country's low unemployment numbers, soaring stock market and expanding economy.
Granted, research by Mary Stegmaier, a professor at the University of Missouri, has shown there's generally a lag in how the public perceives who's responsible for the economy.
"The first year of a presidency is quite different than later years ... because when a president is inaugurated he has inherited the economy from his predecessor," she said. "It takes a while for the public to start holding the new president responsible for the economic conditions."
And recent polls suggest the political winds may be shifting, as an increasing number of Americans begin crediting Trump over former President Obama for the current economic conditions.
The other complication for Republicans in an election year is that even though people might feel optimistic about the economy on a macro level, veteran GOP pollster David Winston says, many people are still not feeling financially secure on a personal level.
"There's a sense that things are improving, but it's going to take some time for that to evolve into a comfort level," Winston said, pointing to a recent survey his consulting company conducted that showed many Americans still feel like they're living paycheck to paycheck, just a few hundred dollars away from a financial crisis.
"People are still assessing — is this a temporary moment in the economy, or is this something longer term that they can have some confidence in that will let them then economically behave differently," Winston explained.
Still, if Republicans are going to focus on one issue they think could give them a boost this campaign season, it's the economy (and taxes). Winston says it's imperative for Republican elected officials to sell the tax plan.
He says the economy is central for most voters.
"If you just take a look at the exit polls, the economy tends to pretty consistently be the top issue," Winston said.
At a rally in Richfield, Ohio, Thursday, the president bragged about the strength of the economy under his presidency.
"Unemployment claims are at their lowest level in 45 years," he said, repeating that last line to applause. "Lowest level — 45 years!"
Trump then told his supporters he needs them this November in order to keep this economy rolling.
"We can't lose that by getting hurt in the midterms, so we can't be complacent," he told the crowd gathered at a local union apprenticeship and training center. "There's never been an economy like this; everyone says it's the most important thing."
But the assumption that positive economic conditions have a direct effect on swinging seats in midterms is something Alan Abramowitz, a political science professor at Emory University, questions. Abramowitz has looked at the results of every midterm dating back to World War II.
He said the best predictor in midterms is the "generic ballot" — a poll question that asks voters which party they'll vote for in Congress (rather than a specific candidate question).
In Abramowitz's research, the other key factor is the president's approval rating.
"The approval rating itself is a much better predictor of what's going to happen in midterm elections than any measure of economic trends," he said.
The economy, of course, can factor into a president's approval numbers, and Abramowitz says his research shows that when we have an economy in a recession, it almost certainly will bring a president's approval rating down, but "when you have a sort of mediocre to good economy, it doesn't necessarily mean the president is going to be popular."
And in situations when the economy and a president's approval rating are not in sync — as is the case these days in the Trump presidency — Abramowitz says the approval rating tends to be far more important.
"We saw something very similar back in the 1960s," he said. "In 1966, we had a midterm election, Lyndon Johnson was in the White House. The war in Vietnam was escalating and his approval rating had dropped, but the economy was very strong."
Democrats lost 47 House seats that year.
So, Abramowitz's message is that an economy that's chugging along may not be enough for voters to credit the party in power, which means Republicans need to figure out a way to tie the economy to how voters feel about the president before November ... so long as the economy stays in good shape.
  • © 2018 npr




NPR thanks our sponsors
Become an NPR sponsor


==//==

LINK:http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com/2018/09/on-eve-of-brazils-independence-day_11.html

#On the eve of Brazil's Independence Day, Bolsonaro shed his

  own blood in favor of Motherland
  • THE BRAZILIAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE JAIR BOLSONARO SAID THAT THIS YEAR'S ELECTIONS ARE "UNDER SUSPICION"
  • CITIZEN AS AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN BRAZIL
  • WHAT A BOOMING ECONOMY MEANS FOR THE MIDTERMS
  • IMPEACHMENT OF TOFFFOLI, MENDES AND LEVANDOWSKY NOW! SIGN PUBLIC PETITION
  • MPF(BRAZILIAN FEDERAL PROSECUTIONS OFFICE) DENOUNCES SÉRGIA MIRANDA FOR FRAUD AT SIMCOL AND SHOULD INVESTIGATE CAIO ASFOR NOVEMBER 27, 2017 WALTER BARDAWIL (SIMCOL’S ISSUE ONGOING)



SOURRCE/LINK: http://time.com/5389310/brazil-presidential-candidate-bolsonaro-stabbed/

Leading Brazilian Presidential Candidate Bolsonaro in Serious Condition After Stabbing (from “TIME”)
U.S.
Politics
World
Tech
Entertainment
Subscribe






World
brazil

Leading Brazilian Presidential Candidate Bolsonaro in Serious Condition After Stabbing
Mute
Current Time 0:46
/
Duration Time 0:58

You Might Like
Sweden's Far-Right Party Gains Support, but Not as Much as Some Feared
Les Moonves Resigns as Head of CBS Amid New Sexual Misconduct Allegations
Seven People Have Been Injured in a Knife Attack in Paris
By MAURICIO SAVARESE and PETER PRENGAMAN / AP
Updated: September 6, 2018 9:27 PM ET
(RIO DE JANEIRO) — Jair Bolsonaro, a leading presidential candidate whose heated rhetoric has electrified some voters and angered others in a deeply polarized Brazil, was stabbed at a campaign event Thursday and suffered serious abdominal injuries.
Police said the suspected attacker was in custody.
Dr. Luiz Henrique Borsato, who performed emergency surgery, said Thursday night that the right-wing candidate was in serious but stable condition and would remain in intensive care for at least seven days. The first round of Brazil’s presidential election is Oct. 7.
The doctor said the two-hour procedure stopped serious internal bleeding and repaired most of the damage from the knifing. The candidate will need further surgery within months for a part of his intestines that was temporarily fixed with a colostomy, the surgeon said.
“We can’t say when he will be able to leave hospital,” Borsato said. “But in the first hours after the surgery his recovery has been very satisfactory.”
Numerous videos on social media showed Bolsonaro, who has promised to crack down on crime in Latin America’s largest nation, being stabbed with a knife to the lower part of his stomach while campaigning in Juiz de Fora, a city about 125 miles (200 kilometers) north of Rio de Janeiro.
At the moment of the attack, Bolsonaro was on the shoulders of a supporter, looking out at the crowd and giving a thumbs up with his left hand.
After the attack, he is seen flinching and then goes out of view. Other videos show supporters carrying him to a car and hitting a man who was apparently the suspect.
Police spokesman Flavio Santiago confirmed to The Associated Press that 40-year-old Adelio Bispo de Oliveira had been arrested in connection with the incident.
De Oliveira was beaten badly by Bolsonaro supporters after the attack. The man was arrested in 2013 for another assault, police said.
Luis Boudens, president of the National Federation of Federal Police, told AP that the assailant appeared to be mentally disturbed.
“Our agents there said the attacker said he was ‘on a mission from God,'” Boudens reported. “Their impression is that they were not dealing with a mentally stable person. He didn’t expect to be arrested so quickly; agents reacted in seconds.”
Bolsonaro’s son, Flavio Bolsonaro, initially posted on Twitter that the injury was superficial and his father was fine. However, an hour later he posted another tweet saying the wound was “worse than we thought.”
He arrived at the hospital “almost dead,” Flavio wrote. “His condition now seems stabilized. Please pray.”
A statement from federal police said the candidate had bodyguards. In the videos, Bolsonaro does not appear to be wearing a protective vest. Such measures are rare for candidates in Brazil.
“This episode is sad,” President Michel Temer told reporters in Brasilia. “We won’t have a rule of law if we have intolerance.”
Bolsonaro, a former army captain, is second in the polls to jailed ex-President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who has been barred from running but continues to appeal.
Despite being a congressman since 1991, Bolsonaro is running as an outsider ready to upend the establishment by cracking down on corruption in politics and reducing crime, in part by giving police a freer hand to shoot and kill while on duty.
While Bolsonaro has a strong following, he is also a deeply polarizing figure. He has been fined, and even faced charges, for derogatory statements toward women, blacks and gays.
He speaks nostalgically about the country’s 1964-1985 military dictatorship and has promised to fill his government with current and former military leaders.
Earlier this week, Bolsonaro said during a campaign event that he would like to shoot corrupt members of the leftist Workers’ Party, which made da Silva its candidate. The comment prompted an immediate rebuke from the attorney general, who asked Bolsonaro to explain that comment.
His vice presidential running mate, Hamilton Mourao, is a retired general who blamed leftists for the knife attack.
Underling Brazil’s divisions, people took to Twitter to either to decry the stabbing and ask for prayers for Bolsonaro or to say the candidate had brought it upon himself and even may have staged it.
The top five trending topics in Brazil were related to the stabbing.
Other presidential candidates quickly denounced the stabbing and many of them decided to suspend their campaign events Friday.
“Politics is done through dialogue and by convincing, never with hate,” tweeted Geraldo Alckmin, former governor of Sao Paulo who has focused negative ads on Bolsonaro.
Fernando Haddad, who is expected to take da Silva’s place on the Workers’ Party ticket, called the attack “absurd and regrettable.”
The attack comes at a time of increasingly heated rhetoric, and sometimes violence, related to campaigns and candidates.
In March, while da Silva was on a campaign tour in southern Brazil before his imprisonment, gunshots hit buses in his caravan. No one was hurt, and da Silva, who is in jail on a corruption conviction, was not in the vehicles that were hit.
  • Also in March, Marielle Franco, a left-leaning black councilwoman in Rio de Janeiro, was shot to death along with her driver after attending an event on empowering black women.
  • It wasn’t immediately clear how the attack on Bolsonaro might reshape a presidential race very much up in the air with the front-runner, da Silva, in jail. In many ways, the incident feeds Bolsonaro’s narrative that Brazil is in chaos and needs a strong hand to steady it.
  • “It’s likely that Bolsonaro will use the attack to argue his opponents are desperate, that they had no other way to stop him,” said Mauricio Santoro, a political science professor at Rio de Janeiro’s state university.
  • A handful of Bolsonaro supporters held a vigil in São Paulo on Thursday night, and briefly exchanged insults with leftists. ‘They made Bolsonaro a martyr,’ said Jonatan Valente, a student. ‘I think the left shot itself in the foot because with this attack they will end up electing Bolsonaro.'”
  • ___
  • Associated Press reporters Marcelo Silva de Sousa in Rio de Janeiro and Sarah DiLorenzo and Victor Caivano in Sao Paulo contributed to this report.

The Brazilian Presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro said that this year's elections are "under suspicion"
The deputy said that a government of his will have "a lot of military officers as minister". (Photo: Fabio Rodrigues Pozzebom / Agência Brasil)
July 31, 2018 Brazil, Cover - Notebook 1, News, Politics
The PSL candidate for the Presidency of the Republic, Jair Bolsonaro, questioned on Monday the smoothness of the October electoral process. "The elections, in any case, are under suspicion," he said during an interview with Roda Viva TV Cultura Program.
The argument, he said, is that the electronic voting system is susceptible to fraud. The presidential candidate criticized the Federal Supreme Court's decision to annul the provision of the electoral law that provided for the vote to be printed, after Raquel Dodge's request from the Attorney General.
"I'm sorry Mrs. Rachel Dodge did a disservice to society a few weeks ago. Through her action, the Supreme Court overturned the possibility of the printed vote in those elections. That is, we will continue under the suspicion of fraud, and voting is a sacred thing of democracy (there is no public vote counting) , "he said.
Asked about the reason for contesting elections that he believes are likely to be fraudulent, the politician said she had no other choice. "What other way do I have, to give up in favor of opposing party (the Worker’s Party (PT) or to the Brazilian Social Democrat Party PSDB? I'll be in the fight anyway. We all suspect on that . "

Bolsonaro said he feels he "has more votes than Lula." "I am received in a completely different way than Lula was in his caravans. And this is everywhere I go, in any corner of Brazil. Acceptance is enormous for my name. What the people are seeing in me is trust, it's credibility. "
Survey by Datafolha in June shows that the retired captain retains leadership in the presidential race in the scenarios where Lula is absent, with 19% of preferences. Bolsonaro again praised the military regime, denying that there had been a coup in 1964. "It was not coup d'état , a coup is when it is at the door," said the candidate, on the grounds that the ousted president, João Goulart, left the country and that his position was declared vacant by Congress at the time.

At the same time, he said that torture, common during the military period, is something that "abhors". As he has been doing, he has denied that he is homophobic, racist, and misogynist. He also said that he receives housing assistance from the Chamber even though he has his own apartment because he is entitled to the benefit.

Asked about archives of the dictatorship, Bolsonaro replied that the question should remain in the past and that the population lacks other demands. "It's a wound that has to be healed. Forget that. The people are suffering from unemployment, with women being raped. If I get there [in the Presidency], it's going forward, "he said.

On Monday, the prosecution reopened investigations into the death of journalist Vladimir Herzog. The case was resumed after the Inter-American Court of Human Rights condemned Brazil earlier this month for failing to investigate and punish the crime that occurred in 1975 during the military dictatorship.

Share:

==//==




Citizen as an Independent Candidate in Brazil
  • filiation.


  • Eduardo Cubas *
    08 Aug 2018 | 4:45 a.m.


    Eduardo Cubas. PHOTO: DISCLOSURE
  • The 2018 elections are heading for an unprecedented event in Brazilian democratic history: citizens are launched independent candidates, without partisan membership and free of the chiefs and party owners.
    The phenomenon becomes a concrete reality from the moment the Federal Supreme Court, on October 4, 2017, recognized the legitimate nature of the discussion of the subject, making civic candidacies one of its general points of repercussion, that is, is under the influence of the International Treaties that Brazil has already signed.
It could not be different, of course, since the STF itself prohibited civil war prison, despite the express provision of the Constitution of the Republic, giving precedence to the same International Treaty that is now used by people to apply: Pact of San José of Costa Rica.
  • In fact, it is the old story of the "stick that gives in Chico, gives in Francisco", as a truism of the Judiciary's acting as impartial element in the application of the norms, since it is not expected conduct other than all Courts in the fulfillment of the decision issued by the Supreme Court and which links the other lower courts.
  • This context of discussion, or rather, the judicialization of politics, gains strength when one approaches the issue from the perspective of a democratic reality when it is the people who, on their own initiative, seek to break the so-called partisan monopoly and begin to apply for their independent candidacies.

  • And it is pointed out: political parties are legal entities like many others, but only with registration in the Brazilian Electoral Court (TSE) and receive all kinds of subsidies, public or private, for their operation: they are real political enterprises, which explains a lot the behavior of its leaders since this bone is bad to leave.

  • The population is fully aware of the evil that this type of business has done for democracy, such is the degree of rejection of it, when it was observed in the last period of its conventions the approval of alliances between absolutely rival groups with a single objective of maintenance of their privileges.

  • In fact, such is the absurdity of the theater of yesteryear that those accused of coup against former President Dilma, today go hand in hand with members of their parties, in a hypocritical cynicism where the last to be respected is the voter, all because the political parties have no competitors. Do what and how you want.
    However, like every social system, there are always such gaps inherent in human behavior, where in electoral terms the so-called sovereign will of the voter causes the law to ensure that the candidate is present at the ballot box at the time of his or her vote. called sub judice candidate, expressly provided for in art. 16-A of the Electoral Law, since the year 2009.
    In fact, the High Electoral Court itself reported that in the last elections when eight thousand candidates competed as "sub judice", because some matter was being debated before the Electoral Court, and nothing more natural than the prediction of resources, as a guarantee of the clause of the due process of law, so much so that the rule of candidacies "sub judice" was never questioned as valid.

  • Of course, the validity of the votes is conditioned, but the candidate's participation in the electoral process is never prevented.

  • Now, is the application more sub judice than the independents? If it was the Federal Supreme Court itself that said so. One does not even have to say that independent candidates like everyone else should be cleaned and be even with their civic obligations, logically, but can not be a prisoner of the will of a political party owner.

  • Much has been said that electronic ballot boxes would not be ready for single applications. So be it. For the sovereignty of the popular will can not be held hostage by computer technicians when they have had all the time available to show their (in) competence in the organization of the elections.

  • It is that the sovereign intelligence of the Ministers of the Superior Electoral Court itself has already foreseen the possibility of a solution to the case when the general norms for the 2018 elections are published, and by Resolution 23554 of December 2017, it is determined that " Cédulas (...) will be realized in the impossibility of using the electronic voting system ".

  • It is important to say that in all the elections there is always the prediction of ballots in case of impossibility of using electronic voting machines, therefore, there will not be a single cent of real extra spent to attend to the right, or of the voter who wishes to choose a candidate independent, or, of the citizen who wants to apply, because the ballots will already be eligible.
    Therefore, this year's elections have the power to elevate Brazil to a country, as in a recent date Mexico or even France have done, to a true participatory democracy, where the voice of the citizen exercised directly and without power of attorney to the party can represent the necessary changes to a new way of doing politics.


  • * Eduardo Cubas, President of the National Union of Federal Judges
  • More content about:
    Articles selected 2018
    Follow the Estadão
        •
        •
        •
        •
        •
        •

    Coupons Statistics
    PUBLICITY
                ▪ American Coupons
          Up to 10% off Smartphones!
                ▪ Submarine Discounts
          Notebooks with up to 25% off!
                ▪ Casas Bahia Promotion
          Up to 35% off Smart TVs





    Institutional
        • Code of ethics
        • Anti-corruption policy
        • Journalism course
        • Accounting statements
        • Terms of use
    Attendance
        • Corrections
        • Subscriber Portal
        • Contact us
        • Work with us
    Contact Us |
        • Broadcast
        • Political Broadcast
        • Applications
    Today

        • Collection
        • SME
        • Car Journal
        • Palate
        • Link
        ILocal
        • State Agency
        • Eldorado Radio
        Contact Us |
        Home
        • Moving Real Estate
    Copyright © 1995 - 2008 All Rights Reserved.
        • Facebook
        • Twitter
        • Google Plus
        • Instagram
        • Pinterest



==//==

April 1, 20187:00 AM ET
President Trump boasted about economic gains under his presidency on Thursday, during a rally at a facility of the Operating Engineers Apprentice and Training, in Richfield, Ohio.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images
Despite a wave of controversies, President Trump's popularity seems to be rising ever so slightly, according to a couple of recent polls. The bump may be linked to the fact that more Americans seem to be crediting Trump for the nation's healthy economy. And that has raised one of the central questions of the midterm election season: whether the economy will help keep Republicans in control.
Voters like Allen Cowan, a 50-year-old from West Virginia, might offer some clues. Cowan considers himself a socially liberal, fiscally conservative voter, the type of voter who reluctantly chose Donald Trump in 2016.
"I held my nose at the voting booth," Cowan said. But, these days he's satisfied with at least one aspect of the Trump era.
"Financially speaking, I cannot complain," he said. "My retirement I have through my employer has shown a remarkable increase."
Still, neither Cowan's personal finances nor the economic health of the country have changed his overall opinion of the president.
"I can look at President Trump and be like 'OK, his policies in regards to the economy and stuff are good for the nation.' But I'm still going to think President Trump — the whole kit and caboodle — is a bitter pill to swallow," he said.
And Cowan is not alone.
Trump's average approval rating is around 41 percent, which is not as high as you would expect, given the country's low unemployment numbers, soaring stock market and expanding economy.
Granted, research by Mary Stegmaier, a professor at the University of Missouri, has shown there's generally a lag in how the public perceives who's responsible for the economy.
"The first year of a presidency is quite different than later years ... because when a president is inaugurated he has inherited the economy from his predecessor," she said. "It takes a while for the public to start holding the new president responsible for the economic conditions."
And recent polls suggest the political winds may be shifting, as an increasing number of Americans begin crediting Trump over former President Obama for the current economic conditions.
The other complication for Republicans in an election year is that even though people might feel optimistic about the economy on a macro level, veteran GOP pollster David Winston says, many people are still not feeling financially secure on a personal level.
"There's a sense that things are improving, but it's going to take some time for that to evolve into a comfort level," Winston said, pointing to a recent survey his consulting company conducted that showed many Americans still feel like they're living paycheck to paycheck, just a few hundred dollars away from a financial crisis.
"People are still assessing — is this a temporary moment in the economy, or is this something longer term that they can have some confidence in that will let them then economically behave differently," Winston explained.
Still, if Republicans are going to focus on one issue they think could give them a boost this campaign season, it's the economy (and taxes). Winston says it's imperative for Republican elected officials to sell the tax plan.
He says the economy is central for most voters.
"If you just take a look at the exit polls, the economy tends to pretty consistently be the top issue," Winston said.
At a rally in Richfield, Ohio, Thursday, the president bragged about the strength of the economy under his presidency.
"Unemployment claims are at their lowest level in 45 years," he said, repeating that last line to applause. "Lowest level — 45 years!"
Trump then told his supporters he needs them this November in order to keep this economy rolling.
"We can't lose that by getting hurt in the midterms, so we can't be complacent," he told the crowd gathered at a local union apprenticeship and training center. "There's never been an economy like this; everyone says it's the most important thing."
But the assumption that positive economic conditions have a direct effect on swinging seats in midterms is something Alan Abramowitz, a political science professor at Emory University, questions. Abramowitz has looked at the results of every midterm dating back to World War II.
He said the best predictor in midterms is the "generic ballot" — a poll question that asks voters which party they'll vote for in Congress (rather than a specific candidate question).
In Abramowitz's research, the other key factor is the president's approval rating.
"The approval rating itself is a much better predictor of what's going to happen in midterm elections than any measure of economic trends," he said.
The economy, of course, can factor into a president's approval numbers, and Abramowitz says his research shows that when we have an economy in a recession, it almost certainly will bring a president's approval rating down, but "when you have a sort of mediocre to good economy, it doesn't necessarily mean the president is going to be popular."
And in situations when the economy and a president's approval rating are not in sync — as is the case these days in the Trump presidency — Abramowitz says the approval rating tends to be far more important.
"We saw something very similar back in the 1960s," he said. "In 1966, we had a midterm election, Lyndon Johnson was in the White House. The war in Vietnam was escalating and his approval rating had dropped, but the economy was very strong."
Democrats lost 47 House seats that year.
So, Abramowitz's message is that an economy that's chugging along may not be enough for voters to credit the party in power, which means Republicans need to figure out a way to tie the economy to how voters feel about the president before November ... so long as the economy stays in good shape.
  • © 2018 npr




NPR thanks our sponsors
Become an NPR sponsor
==//==







SOURCE/LINK: http://convergencias.org.br/tse-denunciado-na-oea-com-carta-do-convergencias/

BRAZILIAN SUPERIOR ELECTORAL COURT (TSE) WAS DENOUNCED IN THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) WITH LETTER BY “CONVERGENCIAS”

June 5, 2018 “Convergências” “Convergencia”
 QUI17 - QUITO (ECUADOR) - 06/06/04 - General view of the opening of the XXXIV General Assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS) held this Sunday, June 6, at the National Theater of the House of Culture in Quito. EFE / Guillermo Legaria
DOCUMENT, SIGNED BY 96 MOVEMENTS AND CIVIL ENTITIES, WAS DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO THE HANDS OF SECRETARY GENERAL LUIZ ALMAGRO LEMES, AT THE 48TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY HELD ON THIS DATE IN WASHINGTON DC DENOUNCING THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN THE BRAZILIAN ELECTORAL PROCESS

The letter, after the praxis presentations, highlights the scope:
We denounce, at this moment, the total lack of transparency in the current Brazilian electoral system, especially as regards the counting of votes, because the electronic voting machine do not issue any printed physical counter-tests for voter pre-confirmation before confirming their wish, as well as of any recount, and not respecting the Constitutional Principle of Publicity of administrative acts (article 37 of the Federal Constitution), making the entire electoral process ILLEGITIBLE, wounding death to Democracy, a process similar to what happened to our unhappy Venezuelan brothers.

The letter tells a brief history of the Brazilian case, making connections, and demonstrating that the authorities insist on breaking the law and even the Constitution, using machines that count votes in secret. The document was delivered by Prof. Hermes Rodrigues Nery, President of the Movement Legislation and Life, who attended the 48th General Assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS) at the invitation of the organization.
Prof. Hermes Nery delivers the Charter directly to the Secretary General

In the letter, the movements ask the OAS to intervene with questions from the Brazilian authorities, as well as to express its views on international human rights and political treaties that are endangered in Brazil.
Here is the Letter in its entirety, with the list of Signatory Movements:
Brazil, June 2018

THEORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES
ATT .: MR. LUIS ALMAGRO LEMES
MD GENERAL SECRETARY
SUBJECT: ABSENCE OF TRANSPARENCY IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS OF BRAZIL
Dear sir:

We coordinated a coalition of movements, groups and activists in the interest of the Brazilian people. These movements have millions of followers in particular by social networks and seek greater integration and effectiveness in their actions in the intelligent and peaceful defense of the State of Law and Democracy, legality of public acts, and also contribute to the authorities constituted by means of of criticisms, suggestions and collections, including actions in the political and judicial field. This coalition, whose denomination is “CONVERGENCIAS” does not have head office , since its components decide the actions through the social networks. And everything is published on a website: www.convergencias.org.br
We denounce, at this moment, the total lack of transparency in the current Brazilian electoral system, especially as regards the counting of votes, because the electronic ballot boxes do not issue any printed physical counter-tests for voter pre-confirmation before confirming their wish, as well as of any recount, and not respecting the Constitutional Principle of Publicity of administrative acts (article 37 of the Federal Constitution), making the entire electoral process ILLEGITIBLE, wounding death to Democracy, a process similar to what happened to our unhappy Venezuelan brothers.
MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE SITUATION:
The current process, fully automated by means of electronic voting machines, although the disclosure of alleged benefits, such as "speed of calculation and elimination of huge queues", has many sensitive points and proven fragilities that make them unfit for their primary function. Even recently, the very court in charge of organizing and supervising the elections has carried out a public test of the process, of the software and of the electronic equipment, and confirmed several problems that had previously been pointed out by leading experts. The court's response was that the problems identified would be corrected in time for the election.

Implemented in 1996, the system, which does not produce any physical proof of the vote, proved to be absolutely unreliable. Needless to say, such a system puts democracy at risk by facing all the processes of transparency and compliance required in the treatment of the "public thing", especially in the choice of representatives of the Legislative Branch and of the Executive Branch, who will lead the country, as a rule, owe their satisfaction to the people.
Despite this, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE), despite the evidence already cited, insists irrationally on the inviolability of the electronic voting machine. Affirmations of this type are known to be crazy, since even more complex and protected systems are invaded daily by hackers, from anywhere on the planet.
In addition, other problems arise, such as the noncompliance with the law by the body that should supervise it, vicious processes of selection of companies that provide services and exorbitant costs of equipment and services.
On 09/29/2015, Law 13,165 was published which obliges the installation of printers in electronic voting machines to issue the physical proof of the vote. After two years, that court did not adopt any measures to comply with this law. No budgetary action was taken, much less if any steps were taken regarding the identification and homologation of printing equipment and respective field bids and tests, only starting such negotiations as of November 2017, in view of the increasing pressures that Convergências and other groups exercise over the TSE. In fact, it was only possible to take some emergency action due to the pressure exerted on the National Congress commission in charge of authorizing additions to the Union Budget, with the allocation of approximately R $ 250 million for this purpose.
The TSE stated that there were insufficient funds for the acquisition of 600 thousand ballot boxes with a printer at a cost of R $ 2.5 billion (US $ 800 million), but in the face of pressure from society, which gathered the correct information and proved that it would not be necessary to manufacture new urns, but only to couple printers to the existing ones, the TSE forced itself to adopt the mentioned alternative. However, avoiding to implement them in their entirety, the then President of TSE, Minister Gilmar Mendes, announced the acquisition of only 30,000 printers, which corresponds to about 5% of the total number of polls, he said, because there would be no time for the acquisition of all 600 thousand printers.
At this point we wish to emphasize that the use of printers in only 5% of the ballot boxes is a flagrant violation of the Brazilian constitutional right of equality of citizens before the law, since 95% of the voters can not have the physical control of the vote. This means that given the vote there is no certainty to whom it was intended other than the one that appears on the screen of the electronic ballot box. There is no way to vote. It violates the principle of transparency, which is mandatory in Article 37 of our Federal Constitution, which requires publicity, impersonality and legality of the administrative acts practiced by the State. Counting votes is an administrative act and therefore must be public. The ballot has been secret since 1996, since it is held electronically inside each ballot box in each electoral section, issuing a ballot box with all the ballots counted. There is also a possibility of fraud in the transmission of data to the regional courts (in each state) and to the Superior Electoral Court in the Federal Capital, as well as in the aggregation of each of these recipients, depending on the nature of the election, whether state or national. Without physical counterproduction, it is impossible to promote recounts.

The solution is, clearly, the adoption of ballot voting, with public count of votes after the closing of the election in each section of the election. Each one, having a low average number of voters - about 200 to 400 voters - makes it very easy and quick to count and issue the respective bulletin, distributing copies to all present in each section, be they party tax and candidates, are ordinary voters. By advertising such bulletins, you create a mirroring of results, increasing transparency and mitigating the possibility of fraud. And there will still be their own vows stored in the canvas urn, sealed, for eventual recount. As is done in Japan, Germany and USA, just to name a few. Public officials - who demand that we "have public faith in them" - although the state is secular and can not mix legal demands with professions of faith - accuse the system of ballot-voting anachronistic, but in fact, it is much more reliable than the current electronic ballot boxes.

Not only for Convergencias, but for almost all of Brazilian society, it became evident that the Minister, the President of the TSE until the end of January / 18, avoided complying with the law at all costs. The current president, Minister Luiz Fux intends to follow in the same direction. However, this situation is seen as a prevarication by senior officials of the Brazilian State, that is, the noncompliance with the function for which they are responsible. The fact itself would already be worrying if it applied to common servers, but when such behaviors depart from servers of such high court, PROTECTED BY THEMSELVES, WHICH ARE PART OF THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT, indicate serious signs of dysfunction in the political system. If this absurd situation persists, the tendency is the degeneration of the system, which could generate an acute and profound crisis in the country, leading us to the catastrophic situation of Venezuela.
Serious problems were also detected in the management of equipment costs. The unit cost of each printer, submitted by TSE, stands at R $ 2,000.00 (US $ 533.00). However, surveys carried out by specialists who are components of Convergências, in addition to others not related to it, have found that this value exceeds the market price of equivalent equipment by ten times. If we consider that the acquisition in large lots normally tends to reduce the unit price, it is certain that the cost of each one can be between R $ 200.00 (US $ 53.00) and R $ 400.00 (US $ 106 , 00), a drastic reduction of costs. Although it was possible to approve in the General Budget of the Union, through a National Congress, a sum of R $ 250 million (about US $ 66 million) that would serve to produce all the 600 thousand printers, the resource was not requested by the TSE .
At this juncture, Convergencias has adopted several procedures to demand from the institutions and responsible authorities the correct and complete compliance with the law so that the entire electoral process is fully transparent in the elections that will take place in the current year.
Aiming to react to these irregularities and illegalities, the “Convergencias” implemented several measures, among them the entry with actions in the Federal Court. One of them is a Popular Action that requires that the vote can be exercised by means of paper ballots in the sections in which the electronic ballot boxes do not provide voting impression equipment for voter pre-conference purposes, before final confirmation of the voting process. voting, thus allowing, if necessary, an audit action.


Even if the impression of the vote allows the subsequent conference, due to physical counter-trial, will incur in breach of constitutional rights if the TSE remains in the illegal provision to provide printers of votes only for a minimal portion of electronic ballot boxes. For this reason, it joined the aforementioned Popular Action, requiring the issuance of paper ballots and ballot boxes for the remaining 95% of the electoral sections. Other actions such as the Brazilian Homeland Association and the Brazilian Resgate Institute require the right of public scrutiny, based on the constitutional principle of publicity of public acts.
Surrounded, the authorities try to suspend the effects of the Law that introduced the compulsory printing of the vote, promulgated in 2015, as mentioned above, through a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADIN) presented by the Attorney General's Office (PGR) to the Supreme Court Federal Court, even after the Letter of the “Convergencias filed and delivered to the Chief Prosecutor, Dr. Raquel Dodge, in which we requested action against the offenses of Minister Gilmar Mendes, then president of TSE and we informed about the actions of the Society in Federal Court. In a strange coincidence, the minister of the STF raffled was nothing more, nothing less than Minister Gilmar Mendes himself, simultaneously a member of the TSE and the STF (in fact, the structuring of the Brazilian Judiciary is very biased). In addition to the unprecedented action, which goes against the interests of the population, against the necessary transparency duly registered in the Federal Constitution (article 37), it also lays down against the Principle of Annuity (Article 16 of the Constitution) less than 12 months before the next election. To further aggravate the framework of immorality and illegality also in this case, the Minister of Justice Gilmar Mendes himself was the rapporteur for the measure proposed by the Attorney General of the Republic, who presided until February / 18 the TSE, being, by law, prevented from judging matter in the which is or has been a part, which is being disregarded by the other ministers of the Federal Supreme Court. That is, the judicial authorities are disrespecting head and shamelessly, the legislation and the Constitution that they have vowed to defend, as well as the legal obligation to do so.

The facts that dissuade all republican lawfulness are multiplied perpetrated by public agents increasingly devoid of modesty. Minister Gilmar Mendes, who presided over the TSE, moved his former direct advisor to be appointed as Director of Technical and Legal Affairs of the Federal Senate, where he has, against him, impeachment proceedings for several reasons. The impeachment processes that are the constitutional responsibility of the Senate of the Republic do not have a technical-juridical opinion exactly of this Executive Board, to which its former advisor was appointed. The Nation is shocked.
Although there is already legislation requiring paper ballots and canvas ballot to be made available at all polling stations in the event of failure in some electronic ballot box, the TSE has insisted on alternatives that entail enormous costs, such as the acquisition of entirely new ballot boxes in which are already coupled with the printers of votes. This insistence, one supposes, is due to the attempt to create a smokescreen to conceal the true intention, which is to keep the present system exactly as it is: susceptible of fraud. In the last election the conference of votes was carried out by a group of the TSE own and without access to any other citizen; the conference was secretly headed by Minister Dias Toffoli, a member of the Workers' Party (PT), an organization that is currently being challenged by Brazilian society in the face of many of its members being jailed and prosecuted by Operation Car Wash. There was no transparency in that calculation and totaling of the votes to the second round of the presidential elections, which occurred in 2014.

It is now expected that the Federal Court will comply with the judicial measures proposed by the Company. Thus, in addition to equalizing all voters in their constitutional rights, we will have 100 percent of the votes with the physical counter-vote for eventual audits.

We also inform that a Legislative Suggestion to the Senate (nº 39/17), which exceeded 20 thousand signatures in very short time, presented by one of the members of the Conclave for Democracy (which integrates Convergencies), was rejected by the Rapporteurship and by the Commission of Human Rights of the Senate (https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/audios/2018/02/cdh-rejeita-sugestao-do-retorno-ao-voto-em-cedula), under the justification that the printed vote is approved. That is, the People are being curtailed of their right to the transparency of the voting process in Brazil. We believe that the international organizations that fight against corruption in the world, seeking the transparency of public acts, should take note of this grave situation in Brazil, which is why we have issued this note, which is signed by Civil Movements and Activists in “Convergencias”.

As we have for the moment, we hope that this DENUNCIATION will be widely disseminated and that the OAS will consider the need to demand from the Brazilian authorities, compliance with the law and the Constitution, which are in line with International Treaties such as the Pact of San José de Costa Rica, of the Charter of Human Rights of the United Nations and of the Inter-American Democratic Charter, adopted at the OAS General Assembly in 2001, and we are at your disposal for further clarification.

Best regards,

“CONVERGENCIAS”
Civil Movements in Brazil

Thomas Korontai

Coordinator
Signatory Movements and Institutions (In alphabetical order):

Acampamento LAVA JATO
Bloco Movimento Brasil
Chega de Impostos
Curitiba Contra Corrupção
Direita Boa Esperança Do Sul
Direita Franca
Direita Guariba
Direita Jaboticabal
Direita Minas
Direita Minas – Bambuí
Direita Minas – Bom Despacho
Direita Minas –Borda da Mata
Direita Minas – Cambuquira
Direita Minas – Capitão Enéas
Direita Minas – Contagem
Direita Minas – Felisburgo
Direita Minas – Governador Valadares
Direita Minas – Itabira
Direita Minas – Ituiutaba
Direita Minas – Juiz de Fora
Direita Minas – Lavras
Direita Minas – Montes Claros
Direita Minas – Ouro Fino
Direita Minas – Paracatu
Direita Minas – Patos de Minas
Direita Minas – Poços de Caldas
Direita Minas – Ribeirão das Neves
Direita Minas – Samonte
Direita Minas – Santa Rita do Sapucaí
Direita Minas – Sete Lagoas
Direita Minas – Três Corações
Direita Minas – Uberaba
Direita Minas – Varginha
Direita Morro Agudo
Direita – Orlândia
Direita – RM Ribeirão Preto
Direita – São José (SJC/SP)
Direita Sertãozinho
Endireita Pernambuco
Instituto Legislação e Vida
Liga Federalista Nacional
Movimento Avança Brasil
Movimento Federalista
Movimento Rua Brasil
Resistência Popular SM
UNATRANS – União Nacional dos Transportes Rodoviários e Autônomos
Ativistas Independentes SP
BrasileirOS.brOS
Conclave pela Democracia
Direita ABC
Direita Cravinhos
Direita Guaíra
Direita Ilha Bela
Direita Litoral
Direita Minas – Alfenas
Direita Minas – Betim
Direita Minas – Bom Repouso
Direita Minas – Cambuí
Direita Minas – Campanha
Direita Minas – Carandaí
Direita Minas – Córrego do Bom Jesus
Direita Minas – Frutal
Direita Minas – Ipatinga
Direita Minas – Itajubá
Direita Minas – João Monlevade
Direita Minas – Lafaiete
Direita Minas – Luminárias
Direita Minas – Nepomuceno
Direita Minas – Ouro Preto
Direita Minas – Passos
Direita Minas – Perdões
Direita Minas – Pouso Alegre
Direita Minas – Rio Pardo
Direita Minas – Santa Luzia
Direita Minas – São Domingos da Prata
Direita Minas – Teófilo Otoni
Direita Minas – Três Pontas
Direita Minas – Uberlândias
Direita Minas – Viçosa
Direita MS (Mato Grosso do Sul)
Direita – Pontal
Direita – RMVale
Direita São Paulo
Direita Ubatuba
Instituto Federalista
Instituto Liberal Acorda Brasil
Marcha Cívica
Movimento Direita Ceará
Movimento juntos Pelo Brasil
NasRuas
São Paulo Conservador
Voz da Liberdade









LG


not respecting the Constitutional Principle of Publicity of administrative acts (article 37 of the Federal Constitution)








==//==
SOURCE/LINK: https://youtu.be/wjktryXOA_s


Piano Sonata No. 2 "Funeral March", III. Marche funèbre - Frédéric Chopin - Classical Music Piano


66.998 visualizações
547 9
Compartilhar








Publicado em 13 de jul de 2014


Piano Sonata No. 2 in B-flat minor, Op. 35 "The Funeral March", III. Marche funèbre: Lento by Frédéric Chopin. Thank you so much for watching this video. I hope you enjoy it and don't forget to share it!


Categoria

Licença

Licença padrão do YouTube
==//==
SOURCE/LINK: http://www.vianoticias.blog.br/mpf-denuncia-sergia-miranda-fraude-na-simcol-deve-investigar-caio-asfor/
MPF(Brazilian Federal Prosecutions Office) denounces Sérgia Miranda for fraud at Simcol and should investigate Caio Asfor
November 27, 2017 Walter Bardawil













Offices "Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria" and "Rocha, Marinho e Sales" would be linked by means of operating behind a particular type naive person offering to represent another in an illegal activity "straw" man (in portuguese “laranjas”)

The Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF), through the Deputy Attorney General, Luciano Mariz Maia, offered the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) a crime against the Sérgia Maria Mendonça Miranda district attorney for fraud involving the failed bankruptcy of Simcol (building company undergoing bankruptcy).

She dispatched an injunction and wrongly ordered (in one of her shifts) the payment of a check in the amount of one million, one hundred and nineteen thousand, nine hundred and thirty-two reais and one centavo to the office "Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria", which, at the time, in May 2013, had provided legal services to the company.
In addition to Sérgia, Frankraley Oliveira Gomes - boyfriend of the judge at the time -, Paulo Fernando Mendonça and Claudia Adrienne Sampaio de Oliveira are enrolled.

Check out excerpt from MPF complaint.
Orange Partnership
SIMCOL would also have been harmed, in a criminal manner, through another injunction of the same adjudicator. The company was forced to pay very high amounts (over R $ 1 million) to the law firm "Rocha, Marinho e Sales", owned by attorney Caio Asfor.

The payment was made by means of an "orange" connected to the "Sampaio, Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria" office.

The denunciation was sent to the Minister of STJ, Herman Benjamin, by the businessman Gilberto Martins Borges, majority partner and representative of the bankrupt company.

Part of the document of Gilberto Borges below.












==//==
[PORTUGUESE VERSION]
Jornal O Sul
A fonte notícias, esporte e entretenimento dos gaúchos.

O presidenciável Jair Bolsonaro disse que as eleições deste ano estão “sob suspeição”

O deputado disse que um governo seu terá “um montão de ministro militar”. (Foto: Fabio Rodrigues Pozzebom/Agência Brasil)
31 de julho de 2018 Brasil, Capa – Caderno 1, Notícias, Política
O candidato do PSL à Presidência da República, Jair Bolsonaro, colocou em dúvida, na segunda-feira (30), a lisura do processo eleitoral de outubro. “As eleições, de qualquer forma, estão sob suspeição”, disse durante entrevista ao programa Roda Viva, da TV Cultura.
O argumento, segundo ele, é que o sistema eletrônico de votação é suscetível a fraudes. O presidenciável criticou a decisão do STF (Supremo Tribunal Federal) de anular dispositivo da lei eleitoral que previa a impressão do voto, após pedido da procuradora-geral da República, Raquel Dodge.
“Eu lamento que a senhora Raquel Dodge tenha prestado um desserviço à sociedade há poucas semanas. Por intermédio de uma ação dela, o Supremo derrubou a possibilidade do voto impresso nessas eleições. Ou seja, vamos continuar sob a suspeição da fraude, e o voto é uma coisa sagrada da democracia”, afirmou.
Questionado sobre o motivo de disputar eleições que ele acredita serem passíveis de fraude, o político afirmou que não tinha outra escolha. “Qual outro caminho eu tenho, entregar para o PT ou para o PSDB? Eu vou estar na luta de qualquer maneira. Todos nós desconfiamos.”
Bolsonaro afirmou que sente que “tem mais votos que Lula”. “Eu sou recebido de uma forma completamente diferente do que o Lula foi em suas caravanas. E isso é em qualquer lugar que eu vá, em qualquer canto do Brasil. A aceitação é enorme para com o meu nome. O que o povo está vendo em mim é confiança, é credibilidade.”
Pesquisa realizada pelo Datafolha em junho mostra que o capitão reformado mantém a liderança na corrida presidencial nos cenários em que Lula está ausente, com 19% das preferências. Bolsonaro voltou a elogiar o regime militar, negando que tenha ocorrido um golpe em 1964. “Não foi golpe, golpe é quando é pé na porta”, disse o candidato, com o argumento de que o presidente derrubado, João Goulart, abandonou o País e que seu cargo foi declarado vago pelo Congresso na época.
Ao mesmo tempo, afirmou que a tortura, comum durante o período militar, é algo que “abomina”. Como vem fazendo, ele negou que seja homofóbico, racista e misógino. Também disse que recebe auxílio moradia da Câmara mesmo tendo apartamento próprio porque tem direito ao benefício.
Questionado sobre arquivos da ditadura, Bolsonaro respondeu que a questão deve ficar no passado e que a população carece de outras demandas. “É uma ferida que tem que ser cicatrizada. Esqueçam isso. O povo está sofrendo com desemprego, com mulheres sendo estupradas. Se eu chegar lá [na Presidência], é daqui para frente”, disse.
Na segunda-feira, o Ministério Público reabriu as investigações sobre a morte do jornalista Vladimir Herzog. O caso foi retomado após a Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos condenar o Brasil, no começo do mês, por não investigar e punir o crime ocorrido em 1975, durante a ditadura militar.
Compartilhe:
Eduardo Cubas*
08 Agosto 2018 | 04h45


Eduardo Cubas. FOTO: DIVULGAÇÃO
As eleições de 2018 caminham para um fato inédito na história democrática brasileira: cidadãos lançam-se candidatos independentes, sem filiação partidária e livres dos caciques e donos dos partidos.
O fenômeno torna-se uma realidade concreta a partir do momento em que o Supremo Tribunal Federal, em 4 de outubro de 2017, reconheceu o caráter legítimo da discussão do tema, tornando as candidaturas cívicas um de seus pontos de repercussão geral, é dizer, está sub judice a influência dos Tratados Internacionais que o Brasil já assinou.
Não poderia ser diferente, por óbvio, já que o próprio STF proibiu a prisão por dívida civil, apesar de texto expresso da Constituição da República prevendo-a, dando prevalência ao mesmo Tratado Internacional com que agora se valem as pessoas para se candidatarem: o Pacto de São José da Costa Rica.
De fato, é a velha história do “pau que dá em Chico, dá em Francisco”, como obviedade da atuação do Poder Judiciário enquanto elemento imparcial na aplicação das normas, dado que não se espera conduta diversa de todos os Tribunais no cumprimento da decisão proferida pelo Corte Suprema e que vincula as demais instâncias inferiores.
Esse contexto de discussão, ou melhor, de judicialização da política ganha mais força quando se coloca o tema sob a perspectiva da realidade democrática quando é o povo que procura, por iniciativa própria, romper o chamado monopólio partidário e começam a requerer suas candidaturas independentes.
E pontua-se: partidos políticos são pessoas jurídicas como outras tantas, mas apenas com inscrição no TSE e passam a receber todo tipo de subvenção, pública ou privada, para seu funcionamento: são verdadeiras empresas políticas, o que explica em muito os comportamentos de seus dirigentes dado que esse osso é ruim de largar.
A população tem a consciência plena do mal que esse tipo de negócio tem feito para a democracia, tal é o grau de rejeição aos mesmos, quando se assistiu no último período de suas convenções a aprovação de alianças entre grupos absolutamente rivais com um único objetivo de manutenção de seus privilégios.
Aliás, tal o absurdo do teatro de outrora que os acusados de golpe sobre a ex-Presidente Dilma, hoje andam de mãos dadas com integrantes de seus partidos, num cinismo hipócrita onde o último a ser respeitado é o eleitor, tudo porque os partidos políticos não possuem concorrentes. Fazem o que e como quiser.
Todavia, como todo sistema social, há sempre as tais brechas inerente ao comportamento humano, donde no plano eleitoral a chamada vontade soberana do eleitor faz com que a lei preveja a garantia de que o candidato esteja presente nas urnas no momento de seu voto, o chamado candidato sub judice, previsto expressamente no art. 16-A da Lei Eleitoral, desde o ano de 2009.
De fato, o próprio Tribunal Superior Eleitoral informou que nas últimas eleições quando oito mil candidatos concorreram como “sub judice”, porque alguma questão estava sendo objeto de discussão perante a Corte Eleitoral, e nada mais natural a previsão de recursos, como garantia da cláusula do devido processo legal, tanto que a regra das candidaturas “sub judice” nunca foi questionada como válida.
Claro que a validade dos votos fica condicionada, mas não se impede jamais a participação do candidato no pleito eleitoral.
Ora, quer candidatura mais sub judice que as independentes? Se foi o próprio Supremo Tribunal Federal que assim disse. Não se precisa sequer dizer que os candidatos independentes como todo outro deve ser ficha limpa e estar quites com suas obrigações cívicas, logicamente, mas não pode ser um prisioneiro da vontade de um dono de partido político.
Muito se disse que as urnas eletrônicas não estariam prontas para as candidaturas avulsas. Que assim seja. Pois a soberania da vontade popular não pode ser refém de técnicos de informática, quando esses mesmos já tiveram todo tempo disponível para mostrar a sua (in)competência na organização das eleições.
É que a inteligência soberana dos próprios Ministros do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral já previu a hipótese de solução para o caso quando da edição das normas gerais para a eleições de 2018, o fazendo pela Resolução 23554, de dezembro de 2017, determinado que “a Votação por Cédulas (…) será realizada na impossibilidade da utilização do sistema eletrônico de votação”.
Importante dizer é que em todas as eleições há sempre a previsão de cédulas para o caso de impossibilidade de uso das urnas eletrônicas, portanto, não haverá um só centavo de real gasto a mais para atender ao direito, seja do eleitor que desejar escolher um candidato independente, ou, do cidadão que quiser se candidatar, porque as cédulas já estarão aptas.
Portanto, as eleições do corrente ano têm o condão de elevar o Brasil a um país, como em recente data o México ou mesmo a França fizeram, a uma verdadeira democracia participativa, onde a voz do cidadão exercida diretamente e sem procuração a partido pode representar as mudanças necessárias para uma nova forma de fazer política.
*Eduardo Cubas, presidente da União Nacional dos Juízes Federais

Mais conteúdo sobre:


PETIÇÃO PUBLICA DE APOIO CARTA ENVIADA PELO CONVERGÊNCIAS DENUNCIANDO TSE NA OEA

5 de junho de 2018 Convergências Convergência 3
QUI17 - QUITO (ECUADOR) - 06/06/04 - Vista general de la inauguración de la XXXIV Asamblea General de la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA) realizada la noche de hoy, domingo 6 de junio, en el Teatro Nacional de la Casa de la Cultura en Quito. EFE/Guillermo Legaria
DOCUMENTO, ASSINADO POR 96 MOVIMENTOS E ENTIDADES CIVIS, FOI ENTREGUE DIRETAMENTE ÀS MÃOS DO SECRETÁRIO GERAL LUIZ ALMAGRO LEMES, NA 48º ASSEMBLEIA GERAL REALIZADA NESTA DATA EM WASHINGTON DC DENUNCIANDO A FALTA DE TRANSPARÊNCIA NO PROCESSO ELEITORAL BRASILEIRO
A carta, após as apresentações de praxe, destaca o escopo:
Denunciamos, neste momento, a ausência total de transparência no atual sistema eleitoral brasileiro, sobretudo no que tange à apuração dos votos, pelo fato de as urnas eletrônicas não emitirem nenhuma contraprova física impressa para conferência previa do eleitor antes de confirmar seu desejo, bem como de eventual recontagem, e não ser respeitado o Princípio Constitucional da Publicidade dos atos administrativos (art. 37 da Constituição Federal), tornando todo o processo eleitoral ILEGÍTIMO, ferindo de morte a Democracia, processo parecido com o que ocorreu aos nosso infelicitados irmãos venezuelanos.
A carta conta uma breve história do caso brasileiro, fazendo conexões, e demonstrando que as autoridades insistem em descumprir a Lei e até a Constituição, utilizando máquinas que contam votos em segredo. O documento foi entregue pelo Prof. Hermes Rodrigues Nery, Presidente do Movimento Legislação e Vida, que participou da 48º Assembleia Geral da OEA (Organização dos Estados Americanos) a convite da entidade.
Prof. Hermes Nery entrega a Carta diretamente ao Secretário Geral
Na carta os movimentos pedem à OEA para que a entidade intervenha com questionamentos junto às autoridades brasileiras, bem como, se manifeste em razão dos tratados internacionais de direitos humanos e políticos colocados em risco no Brasil.
Eis a Carta por completo, com a lista dos Movimentos signatários:
Brasil, Junho de 2018
À
ORGANIZAÇÃO DOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS
ATT.: SR. LUIS ALMAGRO LEMES
MD SECRETÁRIO GERAL
ASSUNTO: AUSÊNCIA DE TRANSPARÊNCIA NO PROCESSO ELEITORAL DO BRASIL
Prezado Senhor:
Coordenamos uma coalizão de movimentos, grupos e ativistas em prol do interesse do povo brasileiro. Tais movimentos tem milhões de seguidores em especial pelas redes sociais e buscam maior integração e eficácia em suas ações na defesa inteligente e pacífica do Estado de Direito e da Democracia, legalidade dos atos públicos, apartidariamente, e igualmente, contribuir com as autoridades constituídas por meio de críticas, sugestões e cobranças, incluindo ações no campo político e judicial. Esta coalizão, cuja denominação é CONVERGÊNCIAS, não têm sede, porquanto seus componentes decidem as ações por intermédio das redes sociais. E tudo é publicado em um site: www.convergencias.org.br
Denunciamos, neste momento, a ausência total de transparência no atual sistema eleitoral brasileiro, sobretudo no que tange à apuração dos votos, pelo fato de as urnas eletrônicas não emitirem nenhuma contraprova física impressa para conferência previa do eleitor antes de confirmar seu desejo, bem como de eventual recontagem, e não ser respeitado o Princípio Constitucional da Publicidade dos atos administrativos (art. 37 da Constituição Federal), tornando todo o processo eleitoral ILEGÍTIMO, ferindo de morte a Democracia, processo parecido com o que ocorreu aos nosso infelicitados irmãos venezuelanos.
DESCRIÇÃO MAIS DETALHADA DA SITUAÇÃO:
O atual processo, totalmente automatizado por meio de urnas eletrônicas, embora a divulgação dos supostos benefícios, como a “rapidez na apuração e a eliminação de filas imensas”, apresenta inúmeros pontos sensíveis e comprovadas fragilidades que as tornam impróprias para a sua função precípua. Inclusive, recentemente, o próprio tribunal encarregado de organizar e fiscalizar as eleições realizou teste público do processo, dos softwares e dos equipamentos eletrônicos, tendo sido confirmados vários problemas que anteriormente haviam sido apontados por destacados especialistas. A resposta do referido tribunal foi de que os problemas constatados seriam corrigidos a tempo para a eleição.
Implantado em 1996, o sistema, que não produz nenhuma contraprova física do voto efetuado, revelou-se absolutamente inconfiável. Desnecessário dizer que tal sistema coloca em risco a própria democracia, afrontando todos os processos de transparência e compliance exigidos no trato da “coisa pública”, especialmente na escolha de representantes do Poder Legislativo e do Poder Executivo, que conduzirão o país, os quais, via de regra, devem satisfações ao povo.
Apesar disso, o Tribunal Superior Eleitoral – TSE – mesmo diante das comprovações já citadas, insiste irracionalmente na tese da inviolabilidade das urnas eletrônicas. Afirmações deste tipo são sabidamente disparatadas, porquanto até sistemas muito mais complexos e protegidos são invadidos diariamente por hackers, a partir de qualquer lugar do planeta.
Adicionalmente, outros problemas apresentam-se, como o descumprimento da lei pelo próprio órgão que deveria fiscalizá-la, processos viciados de seleção de empresas prestadoras de serviços e custos exorbitantes de equipamentos e serviços.
Em 29/09/2015, foi publicada a Lei 13.165 que obriga à instalação de impressoras nas urnas eletrônicas para a emissão da prova física do voto. Passados dois anos, o referido tribunal não adotou nenhuma providência para o cumprimento desta lei. Não foi efetuada qualquer providência orçamentária e muito menos se adotou qualquer providência relativa à identificação e homologação de equipamentos de impressão e respectivas licitações e testes de campo, somente iniciando tais tratativas a partir de novembro de 2017, em face das crescentes pressões que o Convergências e outros grupos exercem sobre o TSE. Inclusive, somente foi possível adotar alguma providência emergencial por força da pressão que se exerceu sobre a comissão do Congresso Nacional encarregada de autorizar adições ao Orçamento da União, com a destinação de aproximadamente R$ 250 milhões para esta finalidade.
O TSE afirmava que não havia fundos suficientes para a aquisição de 600 mil urnas com impressora ao custo de R$ 2,5 bilhões (cerca de US$ 800 milhões), porém diante da pressão da sociedade, que reuniu as informações corretas e provou que não seria necessário fabricar novas urnas, mas tão somente acoplar impressoras às existentes, o TSE obrigou-se a adotar a alternativa apontada. Entretanto, evitando implantá-las em sua totalidade, o então Presidente do TSE, Ministro Gilmar Mendes, anunciou a aquisição de somente 30 mil impressoras, o que corresponde a cerca de 5% do total de urnas, segundo ele, porque não haveria tempo hábil para a aquisição de todas as 600 mil impressoras.
Neste ponto desejamos destacar que a utilização de impressoras em somente 5% das urnas é um flagrante desrespeito ao direito constitucional brasileiro de igualdade dos cidadãos perante a lei, pois 95% dos eleitores não poderão ter a contraprova física do voto efetuado. Isto significa que dado o voto não há nenhuma certeza a quem ele foi destinado a não ser aquela que aparece na tela da urna eletrônica. Não há qualquer forma de conferir a votação. Viola frontalmente e de forma principal o Princípio da Transparência, obrigatoriedade instituída no artigo 37 de nossa Constituição Federal, que exige a publicidade, impessoalidade e legalidade dos atos administrativos praticados pelo Estado. A contagem dos votos é um ato administrativo e, portanto, deve ser público. O escrutínio atualmente, desde 1996, é secreto, pois é realizado eletronicamente no interior de cada urna, em cada seção eleitoral, emitindo-se um “boletim de urna” já com todos os votos contabilizados. Há ainda possibilidade fraudes na transmissão dos dados aos tribunais regionais (em cada estado) e ao Tribunal Superior Eleitoral na Capital Federal bem como, na totalização de cada um desses receptores, conforme a natureza da eleição, se de âmbito estadual ou nacional. Sem a contraprova física, é impossível se promover recontagens.
A solução é, claramente, a adoção do voto em cédula, com contagem pública dos votos após o encerramento do pleito em cada seção eleitoral. Cada uma, tendo uma média baixa de eleitores – cerca de 200 a 400 eleitores – torna muito fácil e rápida a contagem pública e emissão do respectivo boletim, distribuindo-se cópias para todos os presentes em cada seção, sejam fiscais de partido e candidatos, sejam eleitores comuns. Com a publicidade de tais boletins, cria-se um espelhamento de resultados, ampliando a transparência e mitigando a possibilidade de fraude. E ainda restarão os próprios votos armazenados na urna de lona, lacrada, para eventual recontagem. Tal como é feito no Japão, Alemanha e EUA, só para citar alguns. Os agentes públicos – que exigem que “tenhamos fé pública neles” – embora o Estado seja laico e não se pode misturar uma exigibilidade legal com profissão de fé – acusam o sistema do voto em cédula de anacrônico, porém, na verdade, é muitíssimo mais confiável do que as atuais urnas eletrônicas.
Não somente para o Convergências, mas para quase toda a sociedade brasileira, tornou-se evidente que o referido Ministro, Presidente do TSE até o fim do mês de janeiro/18, evitou a todo custo cumprir a lei. O atual presidente, Ministro Luiz Fux pretende seguir em idêntica direção. Ora, esta situação configura-se como prevaricação por altos servidores do Estado Brasileiro, isto é, o descumprimento de função pela qual são responsáveis. O fato em si já seria preocupante caso se aplicasse a servidores comuns, mas quando tais comportamentos partem de servidores de tão alta corte, PROTEGIDOS POR ELES MESMOS, QUE FAZEM PARTE DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL, indicam sinais graves de disfunções no sistema político. Caso persista tal situação absurda, a tendência é a degeneração do sistema, podendo gerar crise aguda e profunda no país, nos levando à situação catastrófica da Venezuela.
Foram detectados problemas graves também no gerenciamento dos custos dos equipamentos. O custo unitário de cada impressora, apresentado pelo TSE, situa-se em R$ 2.000,00 (US$ 533,00). Todavia, levantamentos realizados por especialistas componentes do Convergências, além de outros não ligados a ela, descobriram que este valor supera em dez vezes o preço de mercado de equipamentos equivalentes. Se considerarmos que normalmente a aquisição em grandes lotes tende a reduzir o preço unitário, é certo que o custo de cada uma delas poderá ficar entre R$ 200,00 (U$ 53,00) e R$ 400,00 (US$ 106,00), uma drástica redução de custos. Embora se tenha conseguido aprovar no Orçamento Geral da União, via Congresso Nacional, uma verba destacada de R$ 250 milhões (Cerca de US$ 66 milhões) que serviria para fabricar todas as cerca de 600 mil impressoras, o recurso não foi solicitado pelo TSE.
Diante desta conjuntura, o Convergências adotou diversos procedimentos para exigir das referidas instituições e autoridades responsáveis o cumprimento correto e cabal da lei para que todo o processo eleitoral seja plenamente transparente nas eleições que ocorrerão no ano corrente.
Visando reagir a estes desmandos e ilegalidades, o Convergências efetivou diversas medidas, entre elas o ingresso com ações na Justiça Federal. Uma delas é uma Ação Popular que exige que o voto possa ser exercido por meio de cédulas de papel nas seções nas quais as urnas eletrônicas não disponibilizem equipamento de impressão de voto, para fins de conferência prévia do eleitor, antes da confirmação final do processo de votação, permitindo, dessa maneira, se necessário, ação de auditoria.
Ainda que a impressão do voto permita a conferencia posterior, devido a contraprova física, incorrer-se-á na quebra de direitos constitucionais caso o TSE mantenha-se na disposição ilegal de disponibilizar impressoras de votos somente para uma parcela mínima de urnas eletrônicas. Por esta razão ingressou-se com a referida Ação Popular exigindo a disponibilização de cédulas de papel e urnas de lonas para os restantes 95% das seções eleitorais. Outras ações como a da Associação Pátria Brasil e Instituto Resgata Brasil exigem o direito de escrutínio público, com base no princípio constitucional da publicidade dos atos públicos.
Cercadas, as autoridades ensaiam suspender os efeitos da Lei que introduziu a obrigatoriedade da impressão do voto, promulgada ainda em 2015, conforme citado acima, por meio de uma Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADIN) apresentada pela Procuradoria Geral da República (PGR) ao Supremo Tribunal Federal, mesmo após Carta do Convergências protocolada e entregue à Sra. Procuradora Chefe, Dra. Raquel Dodge, na qual solicitamos providências contra os desmandos do Ministro Gilmar Mendes, então presidente do TSE e informamos sobre as ações da Sociedade na Justiça Federal. Em uma estranha coincidência, o ministro do STF sorteado foi nada mais, nada menos que o próprio Ministro Gilmar Mendes, simultaneamente membro do TSE e do STF (de fato, a estruturação o Judiciário Brasileiro é muito tendenciosa). Além da inusitada ação, que vai contra os interesses da população, contra a necessária transparência devidamente inscrita na Constituição Federal (art. 37), depõe também contra o Princípio da Anualidade (art. 16 da Constituição) que proíbe alteração ou imposição legislativa sobre processo eleitoral em prazo inferior a 12 meses antes das eleições seguintes. Para agravar mais ainda o quadro de imoralidade e ilegalidade também neste processo, o relator da medida proposta pela Procuradora Geral da República é o próprio ministro Gilmar Mendes, quem presidiu até fevereiro/18 o TSE, estando, por lei, impedido de julgar matéria na qual seja ou tenha sido parte, o que está sendo desconsiderado pelos demais ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Ou seja, as autoridades do Judiciário estão desrespeitando frontalmente e sem nenhum pudor, a própria legislação e Constituição que juraram defender, além da obrigação de ofício de assim proceder.
Os fatos que desabonam toda e qualquer licitude republicana se multiplicam perpetrados por agentes públicos cada vez mais desprovidos de pudores. O Ministro Gilmar Mendes, que presidia o TSE, deslocou seu ex-assessor direto para ser nomeado como Diretor de Assuntos Técnicos e Jurídicos do Senado Federal, onde tem, contra ele, processos de pedido de impeachment por diversos motivos. Os processos de impeachment que são responsabilidade constitucional do Senado da República prescindem de um parecer técnico-jurídico exatamente desta Diretoria, para a qual, seu ex-assessor foi nomeado. A Nação encontra-se escandalizada.
Embora já exista legislação que obrigue a disponibilização de cédulas de papel e urnas de lona em todas as seções eleitorais para o caso de falha em alguma urna eletrônica, o TSE tem insistido em alternativas que implicam enormes custos, como a aquisição de urnas totalmente novas nas quais já venham acopladas as impressoras de votos. Essa insistência, supõe-se, se deve à tentativa de criar uma cortina de fumaça para dissimular a verdadeira intenção, que é manter o sistema atual exatamente como está: passível de fraude. Na última eleição a conferência de votos foi realizada por um grupo do próprio TSE e sem acesso a qualquer outro cidadão; a conferência foi secreta e dirigida pelo próprio Ministro Dias Toffoli, ligado ao Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT), organização que atualmente sofre enorme contestação da sociedade brasileira, em face de muitos de seus membros estarem presos e processados pela Operação Lava Jato. Não houve nenhuma transparência naquela apuração e totalização dos votos ao segundo turno das eleições à Presidência da República, fato ocorrido em 2014.
Espera-se agora, que a Justiça Federal acate as medidas judiciais propostas pela Sociedade. Desta forma, além de igualarem-se todos os eleitores nos seus direitos constitucionais, teremos cem por cento dos votos com a contraprova física para fins de eventuais auditorias.
Informamos ainda, que uma Sugestão Legislativa ao Senado (nº 39/17) que ultrapassou as 20 mil assinaturas em curtíssimo espaço de tempo, apresentada por um dos membros do Conclave pela Democracia (que integra a Convergências), foi rejeitada pela Relatoria e pela Comissão de Direitos Humanos do Senado (https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/audios/2018/02/cdh-rejeita-sugestao-do-retorno-ao-voto-em-cedula), sob a justificativa de que o voto impresso está aprovado. Ou seja, o Povo está sendo cerceado do seu direito à transparência do processo de votação no Brasil. Acreditamos que as organizações internacionais que lutam contra a corrupção no mundo, buscando a transparência dos atos públicos, deveriam tomar conhecimento desta grave situação no Brasil, razão pela qual, emitimos esta nota, que vai assinada por Movimentos e Ativistas Civis em Convergências.
Sendo o que se tinha para o momento, esperamos que esta DENÚNCIA seja amplamente divulgada e que a OEA considere a necessidade de exigir das autoridades brasileiras, o cumprimento da lei e da Constituição, as quais, estão alinhadas com os Tratados Internacionais como o do Pacto de San José de Costa Rica, da Carta de Direitos Humanos da ONU e da Carta Democrática Interamericana, aprovada na Assembleia Geral da OEA em 2001, ao que, nos colocamos à inteira disposição para maiores esclarecimentos que se façam necessários.
Com os melhores cumprimentos,
CONVERGÊNCIAS
Movimentos Civis pelo Brasil
Thomas Korontai
Coordenador
Movimentos e Instituições Signatárias (Em ordem alfabética):
Acampamento LAVA JATO
Bloco Movimento Brasil
Chega de Impostos
Curitiba Contra Corrupção
Direita Boa Esperança Do Sul
Direita Franca
Direita Guariba
Direita Jaboticabal
Direita Minas
Direita Minas – Bambuí
Direita Minas – Bom Despacho
Direita Minas –Borda da Mata
Direita Minas – Cambuquira
Direita Minas – Capitão Enéas
Direita Minas – Contagem
Direita Minas – Felisburgo
Direita Minas – Governador Valadares
Direita Minas – Itabira
Direita Minas – Ituiutaba
Direita Minas – Juiz de Fora
Direita Minas – Lavras
Direita Minas – Montes Claros
Direita Minas – Ouro Fino
Direita Minas – Paracatu
Direita Minas – Patos de Minas
Direita Minas – Poços de Caldas
Direita Minas – Ribeirão das Neves
Direita Minas – Samonte
Direita Minas – Santa Rita do Sapucaí
Direita Minas – Sete Lagoas
Direita Minas – Três Corações
Direita Minas – Uberaba
Direita Minas – Varginha
Direita Morro Agudo
Direita – Orlândia
Direita – RM Ribeirão Preto
Direita – São José (SJC/SP)
Direita Sertãozinho
Endireita Pernambuco
Instituto Legislação e Vida
Liga Federalista Nacional
Movimento Avança Brasil
Movimento Federalista
Movimento Rua Brasil
Resistência Popular SM
UNATRANS – União Nacional dos Transportes Rodoviários e Autônomos
Ativistas Independentes SP
BrasileirOS.brOS
Conclave pela Democracia
Direita ABC
Direita Cravinhos
Direita Guaíra
Direita Ilha Bela
Direita Litoral
Direita Minas – Alfenas
Direita Minas – Betim
Direita Minas – Bom Repouso
Direita Minas – Cambuí
Direita Minas – Campanha
Direita Minas – Carandaí
Direita Minas – Córrego do Bom Jesus
Direita Minas – Frutal
Direita Minas – Ipatinga
Direita Minas – Itajubá
Direita Minas – João Monlevade
Direita Minas – Lafaiete
Direita Minas – Luminárias
Direita Minas – Nepomuceno
Direita Minas – Ouro Preto
Direita Minas – Passos
Direita Minas – Perdões
Direita Minas – Pouso Alegre
Direita Minas – Rio Pardo
Direita Minas – Santa Luzia
Direita Minas – São Domingos da Prata
Direita Minas – Teófilo Otoni
Direita Minas – Três Pontas
Direita Minas – Uberlândias
Direita Minas – Viçosa
Direita MS (Mato Grosso do Sul)
Direita – Pontal
Direita – RMVale
Direita São Paulo
Direita Ubatuba
Instituto Federalista
Instituto Liberal Acorda Brasil
Marcha Cívica
Movimento Direita Ceará
Movimento juntos Pelo Brasil
NasRuas
São Paulo Conservador
Voz da Liberdade

A carta em inglês:   Letter to OAS – Convergencias


Compartilhe isso:

Previous
MOVIMENTOS EXIGEM QUE AGU E STF INTERVENHAM PARA SUBSTITUIR GILMAR MENDES
Next
EDITORIAL – STF NOVAMENTE AFRONTA A LEI, O SENSO COMUM E A CONSTITUIÇÃO

3 Comentários

Mirimar
5 de junho de 2018 em 22:18
Urgente Isso. O povo consciente da direita exige o voto impresso. É lei, é dever do Estado e direito do cidadão.
Responder
Jair das NEVES LOURENÇO BARBEIRO
6 de junho de 2018 em 11:50
Concordo integralmente com o documento acima onde os direitos do povo está sendo tolhido por pessoas que não consigo entender o interesse em tornar a votação e apuração transparente ‘ hoje não são..
Responder
Prof. Padilla pesquisador transdisciplinar na UFRGS Faculdade de Direito
7 de junho de 2018 em 05:15
Magnífica atitude! Sugiro também uma releitura, pela abordagem transdisciplinar, à luz dos 4 planos de atividade humana e do uso das emoções pelos psicoPaTas na criação de uma entourage psicoPaTeta: http://bit.ly/1mundomelhor
Responder

Deixe uma resposta

Seu email não será publicado.
Comentário
Nome*
E-mail*
Website
Notifique-me sobre novos comentários por e-mail.
Notifique-me sobre novas publicações por e-mail.
Pesquisar por:
Copyright © 2018 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes
==//==
SOURCE/LINK: http://www.vianoticias.blog.br/mpf-denuncia-sergia-miranda-fraude-na-simcol-deve-investigar-caio-asfor/
MPF denuncia Sérgia Miranda por fraude na Simcol e deve investigar Caio Asfor
Novembro 27, 2017 Walter Bardawil
Escritórios “Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria” e “Rocha, Marinho e Sales” estariam ligados por meio de laranjas
O Ministério Público Federal (MPF), através do vice-procurador-geral da República, Luciano Mariz Maia, ofereceu ao Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) denúncia crime contra a desembargadora cearense Sérgia Maria Mendonça Miranda por fraude envolvendo a massa falida da Simcol.
Ela despachou liminar e ordenou, indevidamente (em um de seus plantões), o pagamento de cheque no valor de R$ 1.119.932,01 (hum milhão, cento e dezenove mil, novecentos e trinta e dois reais e um centavo) ao escritório “Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria”, que, na época, em maio de 2013, havia prestado serviços advocatícios à empresa.
Além de Sérgia, estão enrolados Frankraley Oliveira Gomes – namorado da desembargadora à época -, Paulo Fernando Mendonça e Cláudia Adrienne Sampaio de Oliveira.
Confira trecho da denúncia do MPF
Parceria Laranja
A SIMCOL teria sido também prejudicada, de forma criminosa, através de outra liminar  da mesma desembargadora. A empresa foi forçada a efetuar o pagamento  de valores altíssimos (superiores a R$ 1 milhão) ao escritório de advocacia “Rocha, Marinho e Sales”, pertencente ao advogado Caio Asfor.
O pagamento se deu por meio de um “laranja” ligado ao escritório “Sampaio, Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria”. 
A denúncia  foi encaminhada ao ministro do STJ, Herman Benjamin, pelo empresário Gilberto Martins Borges, sócio majoritário e representante da empresa falida.
Documento de Gilberto Borges



THE END



Postado por às

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário

Assinar: Postar comentários (Atom)