SOURCE / LINK: https://youtu.be/O3zwGAKuGJY
"PANORAMA BRASIL" - #BRAZIL NATIONAL ACT IN FAVOR OF PRINTED VOTE
8 views
2 thousand 18 Share
Free Tuesday
Broadcast live 3 hours ago➤ ACCESS OUR LIBRARY: https://livraria.tercalivre.com.br/ ➤ Subscribe to our channel: https://goo.gl/8mbVdC ➤ ENABLE THE NOTIFICATIONS! ➤ Download the audios: https://soundcloud.com/tercalivre ➤ Tuesday Free Courses: https://www.tercalivre.com.br ➤ Facebook: http://bit.ly/TercaLivreFB ➤ Twitter: http: // bit .ly / TwitterDoTL ➤ Be our SPONSOR: http://www.apoia.se/tercalivre NIGHT BULLETIN PHONE: +55 54 3013-9045 © 2017 Tuesday All Rights Reserved
Category
News & Politics
License
YouTube Standard License
Number of reviews
==//==
COMPLETE
BRADO EM UNÍSSONO/THE CRY IN UNISON: #Brazilian Democracy Dies in Darkness: #ON DAY 02/... http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com/2018/02/brazilian-democracy-dies-in-darkness-on.html?spref=tw
==//==
Seu email foi enviado para seu amigo.
Voltar para onde você estava:
http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/brazilian-democracy-dies-in-darkness-on.html
BRADO EM UNÍSSONO/THE CRY IN UNISON: #ON DAY 02/21 ACTION IN FAVOR PARALLEL PAPER TRAIL... http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com/2018/02/jingle-sobre-o-voto-impresso-movimento_12.html?spref=tw
==//==
Seu email foi enviado para seu amigo.
Voltar para onde você estava:
http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/jingle-sobre-o-voto-impresso-movimento_12.html
BRADO EM UNÍSSONO/THE CRY IN UNISON: How Hackers Broke Into U.S. Voting Machines in Les... http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com/2018/02/urnas-eletronicas-nao-passam-no-teste_12.html?spref=tw
==//==
Seu email foi enviado para seu amigo.
Voltar para onde você estava:
http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/urnas-eletronicas-nao-passam-no-teste_12.html
It addresses our interests this way, for a transparent, auditable electoral system that ordinary individuals can monitor. (Whatsapp Full Federalism Group)
LINK: http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/brazilian-democracy-dies-in-darkness-on.html
LINK:http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/brazilian-democracy-dies-in-darkness-on.html
#Brazilian Democracy Dies in Darkness
#ON DAY 02/21 ACTION IN FAVOR PARALLEL PAPER TRAIL- A PRINTED PAPER RECORD VOTERS/HACKERS FACILITIES TO BREAK INTO U.S. VOTING MACHINES AT THE ANNUAL DEFCON/#THE ONGOING OF SIMCOL ISSUE AND OTHER RELATED NEWS
SEE VIDEO: https://youtu.be/KjuQ41M_gDg
QUOTE OF THE DAY ON BRAZILIAN ELECTION TRANSPARENCY…
February 9, 2018 “Convergencias-Convergência”
"I do not want to audit the ballot in Brazil. I really want to audit the votes, only ensured with parallel paper trail-a printed paper record voters !
"(Maria Regina Monte - Facebook)
Sentence before the "providence" taken by Minister Fux to audit the software and electronic ballot boxes shortly before elections, reported yesterday, 08/02/18, in Folha de São Paulo.
Previous
PRELIMINARY AUDIT ON ELECTRONIC BALLOTS – THAT’S, IN FACT A JOKE
Next
ADGRESS OF THE PGR IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
1 Comment
Maria R S Farjallat
February 9, 2018 at 5:02 PM
#ON DAY 02/21 ACTION IN FAVOR PARALLEL PAPER TRAIL-
A PRINTED PAPER RECORD VOTERS
February 12, 2018 Convergences Convergence 0
The “Rua Brasil” Movement has already confirmed that on February 21, at 5:00 pm, in front of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (STF), there will be a parallel paper trail - a printed paper record voters or ballot paper demonstration, that is, an auditable vote.
The Movement can be found on Facebook link: <https://www.facebook.com/pagerua/>. The leader is Ray Alves.
As we receive more information about other cities, we'll post them on this page, mark the follow-up!
Watch the video produced by Rua Brasil:
Previous
The Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADIN) OF The Brazilian Federal Prosecutions Office (PGR) IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Be the first to comment
Leave an answer
Your email address will not be published.
Comment
==//==
SOURCE/LINK: http://www.vianoticias.blog.br/mpf-denuncia-sergia-miranda-fraude-na-simcol-deve-investigar-caio-asfor/
MPF(Brazilian Federal Prosecutions Office) denounces Sérgia Miranda for fraud at Simcol and should investigate Caio Asfor
November 27, 2017 Walter Bardawil
Offices "Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria" and "Rocha, Marinho e Sales" would be linked by means of operating behind a particular type naive person offering to represent another in an illegal activity "straw" man (in portuguese “laranjas”)
The Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF), through the Deputy Attorney General, Luciano Mariz Maia, offered the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) a crime against the Sérgia Maria Mendonça Miranda district attorney for fraud involving the failed bankruptcy of Simcol (building company undergoing bankruptcy).
She dispatched an injunction and wrongly ordered (in one of her shifts) the payment of a check in the amount of one million, one hundred and nineteen thousand, nine hundred and thirty-two reais and one centavo to the office "Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria", which, at the time, in May 2013, had provided legal services to the company.
In addition to Sérgia, Frankraley Oliveira Gomes - boyfriend of the judge at the time -, Paulo Fernando Mendonça and Claudia Adrienne Sampaio de Oliveira are enrolled.
Check out excerpt from MPF complaint.
Orange Partnership
SIMCOL would also have been harmed, in a criminal manner, through another injunction of the same adjudicator. The company was forced to pay very high amounts (over R $ 1 million) to the law firm "Rocha, Marinho e Sales", owned by attorney Caio Asfor.
The payment was made by means of an "orange" connected to the "Sampaio, Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria" office.
The denunciation was sent to the Minister of STJ, Herman Benjamin, by the businessman Gilberto Martins Borges, majority partner and representative of the bankrupt company.
Part of the document of Gilberto Borges below.
==//==
It addresses our interests this way, for a transparent, auditable electoral system that ordinary individuals can monitor. (Whatsapp Full Federalism Group)
==//==
É de nosso interesse um sistema eleitoral transparente, auditável e que indivíduos comum possam fiscaliza-lo. (Grupo Federalismo Pleno do Whatsapp)
==//==
SOURCE/LINK: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/02/09/why-paper-ballots-are-the-best-safeguard-against-election-hacking/?utm_term=.5811d9c64be1
Democracy Dies in Darkness
•
• Sections
• Subscribe
• Sign In
• Accessibility for screenreader
DemocracyPost
Opinion
The best safeguard against election hacking
By Brian Klaas February 9
Voters cast their votes during the U.S. presidential election in Medina, Ohio, on Nov. 8, 2016. (Aaron Josefczyk/Reuters)
This week, the U.S. government confirmed that Russian hackers infiltrated voting systems in several states, having targeted 21 of them. While there is currently no evidence suggesting any votes were changed, a hostile foreign power did gain access to voter registration databases — the vital foundation of election integrity. After all, if you control who can and cannot vote, you control a democracy.
America’s foolish experiment with digital voting processes must end. The Kremlin — or other hostile foreign actors — will certainly strike again. It’s time for good old-fashioned paper to make a comeback.
Researchers at Princeton University have shown that they can pick the lock on voting machines in seven seconds. In minutes, they could have replaced the machine’s chip with a malicious one, ensuring that voters who voted for candidate A were recorded as having voted for candidate B. Thankfully, their demonstrations were just for research. But they could have been real.
The story must be told.
Your subscription supports journalism that matters.
Try 1 month for $1
All Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting machines are vulnerable to local (in-person) hacking. Some can also be hacked remotely, over the Internet. These vulnerabilities are particularly glaring for machines without a voter-verified paper audit trail, which enables voters to see their vote choice on a piece of paper and verify that their vote was recorded correctly.
DRE voting machines without any paper trail whatsoever are in use in 15 different states. About 1 in 5 voters cast a ballot without any sort of verified paper trail. Even if foul play were suspected, it would be virtually impossible to audit the tally, because the only recorded votes would be on the compromised machine itself.
The least secure models, such as WinVote, can be hacked remotely over WiFi. In recent investigations, researchers found that some administrator accounts had a password that was “admin.” Many machines were found to be running outdated Windows XP software. In some cases, software hadn’t been updated since 2004.
Recent illustrations of these vulnerabilities have been darkly comic. One research team hacked into a voting machine to have it play the Pac-Man game. Another programmed the system to play the University of Michigan fight song every time a vote was cast. Last summer, a group of hackers “Rick-rolled” a voting machine, programming it to play Rick Astley’s iconic 1980s hit “Never Gonna Give You Up.” These tweaks were simple. They took minutes. And they were virtually undetectable, despite manufacturers’ claims that the machines are secure and feature “tamper-evident” seals.
If a few amateur hackers could turn a voting machine into a game, think of how Russia, Iran or a nonstate group of hackers could play with our democracy.
In U.S. elections, there are three main areas of digital vulnerability: the voter registration database (who can vote); the voting machines themselves (who people vote for); and the tabulation (the government’s count). Malicious hackers or agents could delete groups of voters from registration databases. They could program DRE machines to switch votes. It is even possible to tamper with optical scan machines, which scan paper ballots and record tallies, so they miscount. Malicious agents could change election outcomes by manipulating official result tallies on government websites.
Donald Trump is president because a small number of voters — so few that they could fit in a single football stadium — were the deciding factor in just three states. It’s not hard to imagine how easy it would be to change a small number of votes in several strategically located precincts and steal an election.
Worse, a hostile foreign actor wouldn’t even have to change the result to severely damage U.S. democracy. Imagine if evidence emerged that even a handful of voting machines had been hacked in Michigan, Pennsylvania or Wisconsin in 2016. If that happened, it wouldn’t be necessary to show that the result changed; it would destroy Americans’ confidence in the electoral process regardless. A cloud of illegitimacy would hang over the U.S. government for years. And all it would take is a single cunning Kremlin agent visiting a few unguarded precincts in a swing state and installing new chips or a bit of malware.
Virginia rightly took 2016 as a wake-up call and retired its vulnerable DRE machines. But that’s not good enough. The federal government should mandate that all elections must, at a minimum, be able to produce an independently verified paper trail for every election held at the state and local level.
Moreover, only 32 states mandate post-election audits (of varying quality and rigor). It must be 50.
Thankfully, a bipartisan group of six senators is championing legislation to secure our elections. There’s no time to waste. The politicians that Americans choose in elections make decisions that affect the lives of billions of people. Do we really want to cede that choice to the Kremlin or Iran or even a cyberterrorist group?
President Trump’s response to Russian attacks on American democracy has been to praise Russian President Vladimir Putin, thank him for purging U.S. diplomats from Moscow and float the idea of forming a joint cybersecurity venture between Moscow and Washington. Trump has made clear that he is more interested in kowtowing to the Kremlin than safeguarding our republic.
Congress and state legislatures must not make the same mistake. Twenty-first-century elections require a return to a 1st century B.C. technology: paper.
98
Comments
==//==
How Hackers Broke Into U.S. Voting Machines in Less Than 2 Hours
Stay Connected
International
Bullet Trains Are Transforming the World's Biggest Migra...
Tech
BitGrail Cryptocurrency Exchange Claims $195 Million Los...
Entertainment
Fifty Shades Freed Leads Three New Films at Weeke...
Finance
The Equifax Hack Exposed More Data Than Previously Repor...
1. Tech
2. Mastering Data
How Hackers Broke Into U.S. Voting Machines in Less Than 2 Hours
Courtesy of Cylance
By Barb Darrow
July 31, 2017
It took computer hackers less than two hours to break into U.S. voting machines at the annual DefCon computer security conference, according to tech news site The Register. DefCon is an annual event that draws hackers from all over the world to Las Vegas to strut their stuff.
The idea behind this effort was “to raise awareness and find out for ourselves what the deal is. I’m tired of reading misinformation about voting system security,” conference founder Jeff Moss noted, according to USA Today.
Some participants physically took machines apart to find and document vulnerabilities. Others gained remote access over Wi-Fi and were able to upload malware to them. DefCon organizers aggregated some 30 voting machines—including those made by Diebold, Sequoia, and WinVote—to make up its first-ever Voter Hacking Village, and turned them over to the pros on Friday to work their magic.
Get Data Sheet, Fortune’s technology newsletter
The wireless hacks are clearly more worrisome because of their stealthy nature. People are apt to notice someone taking a screwdriver to a polling place during an election.
Hackers testing the security of 30 voting machines at Defcon
"We got in within 35 minutes" pic.twitter.com/Zc9cKBXpD4#defcon #Defcon25 @defcon
— Matthijs Pontier (@Matthijs85) July 29, 2017
This is the first time that DefCon formally took on the issue of voting machine hacks—a hot topic given that U.S. intelligence agencies have found that Russians used hacking techniques to influence the last U.S. presidential election.
While there is no proof that actual vote count was compromised by the Russian efforts, there hasn’t been much research to see if that could happen. Danish researcher Carsten Schürmann used a 14-year old exploit in Microsoft (msft, +3.66%) Windows XP operating system to gain remote access to one unpatched machine within 90 minutes. That access would enable him to change the vote tally from anywhere, according to CNET.
Incredible. #votingvillage. Very recent #votingmachines being hacked. Some running Windows XP. Scary stuff. #defcon pic.twitter.com/rGYTel6oSC
— Micho Schumann (@MichoSchumann) July 29, 2017
“Without question, our voting systems are weak and susceptible,” said Jake Braun, CEO of security consulting firm Cambridge Global Advisors, told the Register. “Thanks to the contributions of the hacker community today, we’ve uncovered even more about exactly how.”
SPONSORED FINANCIAL CONTENT
You May Like
Leadership
Elon Musk Sent This Classic Sci-Fi Novel Into Space on the Falcon Heavy
Autos
Uber’s Waymo Settlement Seen as a Win for New CEO
Tech
Bitcoin and Bug Bounties on the Hill, Apple and Cisco's Cyber Deal, iPhone Leak
Entertainment
MoviePass Continues Aggressive Growth Push With Limited-Time Theater-Plus-Streaming Bundle
Tech
Apple HomePod Launches With Big Sound—and Even Bigger Questions
Tech
Apple TV App Gets Live News Broadcasts from CNN, Fox News, and CNBC
Stories From
Canadian Pharma Billionaire And His Wife Were Murdered
marketwatch.com
The Next Bear Market Will Be ‘The Worst In Our Lifetime'
marketwatch.com
President Trump's Approval Rating Just Hit Yet Another N...
time.com
Judge Rules: Doctor Can't Practice, As She Doesn't Use A...
time.com
Apple Confirms All Macs And IOS Devices Affected By Secu...
time.com
Read More
Tech
Another Free Data Backup Option Bites The Dust
Tech
Why LinkedIn Is a Treasure Trove for Spies, Hackers, and...
Tech
This Startup Raked in $50 Million to Take on Salesforce
Tech
IBM Claims Big Breakthrough in Deep Learning
Sign Up for Our Newsletters
Sign up now to receive FORTUNE's best content, special offers, and much more.
SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe & Save
Subscribe today and save 79% off the cover price.
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Sign Up for Our Newsletters
Sign up now to receive FORTUNE's best content, special offers, and much more.
SUBSCRIBE
• 40 Under 40
• 100 Best Companies to Work For
• Fortune 500
• Global 500
• Most Powerful Women in Business
• World's 50 Greatest Leaders
• World's Most Admired Companies
• All Rankings
• Home
• Automotive
• Careers
• Design
• Energy & Environment
• Executive Travel
• Finance
• Commentary
• Health
• International
• Leadership
• Luxury
• Markets
• Most Powerful Women
• Retail
• Sports
• Technology
• The Ledger
• Venture
• Photography
• Podcasts
• Videos
• Newsletters
• Magazine
• Fortune Knowledge Group
• Fortune Data Store
• Fortune Conferences
• TIME Health
• Customer Service
• Site Map
• Privacy Policy
• Advertising
• Subscribe
• Give a Gift
• Ad Choices
• Terms of Use
• Your California Privacy Rights
• Time Inc. Careers
© 2017 Time Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy (Your California Privacy Rights).
Fortune may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Interactive Data. ETF and Mutual Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Dow Jones Terms & Conditions: http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/html/tandc/indexestandcs.html.
S&P Index data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.
==//==
DIA 21/02 AÇÕES PELO VOTO IMPRESSO
12 de Fevereiro de 2018 Convergências Convergência 0
O Movimento Rua Brasil já confirmou que no dia 21/02, às 17h, na frente do STF, haverá manifestação pelo voto impresso ou em cédula, ou seja, voto auditável.
O Movimento pode ser encontrado no Facebook. A líder é Ray Alves.
A medida em que recebermos mais informações sobre outras cidades, as postaremos nesta página, marque o acompanhamento!
Veja o vídeo produzido pelo Rua Brasil:
Previous
A ADIN DA PGR É INCONSTITUCIONAL!
Seja o primeiro a comentar
Deixe uma resposta
Seu email não será publicado.
Comentário
Frase do dia…
9 de Fevereiro de 2018 Convergências Convergência 1
“Não quero auditar a urna. Quero auditar os votos, e isso só com o voto impresso!” (Maria Regina Monte – Facebook)
Frase dita diante da “providência” tomada pelo Ministro Fux de auditar os softwares e urnas eletrônicas pouco antes de eleições, relatada ontem, 08/02/18, na Folha de São Paulo.
Previous
AUDITORIA PRÉVIA NAS URNAS ELETRÔNICAS – MAIS UMA PIADA
Next
A ADIN DA PGR É INCONSTITUCIONAL!
1 Comentário
1.
Maria R S Farjallat
9 de Fevereiro de 2018 em 17:02
Queremos eleições honestas passíveis de auditoria !!
Responder
Deixe uma resposta
Seu email não será publicado.
Comentário
Nome*
E-mail*
Website
Notifique-me sobre novos comentários por e-mail.
Notifique-me sobre novas publicações por e-mail.
Pesquisar por:
Convergências na Mídia
•
Convergência repercute no jornal O GLOBO
27 de setembro de 2016 0
Notícias recentes
• A ADIN DA PGR É INCONSTITUCIONAL!
• Frase do dia…
• AUDITORIA PRÉVIA NAS URNAS ELETRÔNICAS – MAIS UMA PIADA
• SERIA UM GRANDE “ACORDÃO” CONTRA O BRASIL?
• ENTÃO, ATÉ AGORA, FOI TUDO INCONSTITUCIONAL?
Comentários
• Maria R S Farjallat em Frase do dia…
• MARCOS SOUZA AMORIM em AUDITORIA PRÉVIA NAS URNAS ELETRÔNICAS – MAIS UMA PIADA
• vilson Scussel em SERIA UM GRANDE “ACORDÃO” CONTRA O BRASIL?
• Marcos Mariani em AUDITORIA PRÉVIA NAS URNAS ELETRÔNICAS – MAIS UMA PIADA
• sydney m. farrajota em SMARTMATIC FORA DO PREGÃO
Filtrar notícias por movimento
Filtrar notícias por movimento
MPF denuncia Sérgia Miranda por fraude na Simcol e deve investigar Caio Asfor
Novembro 27, 2017 Walter Bardawil
Escritórios “Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria” e “Rocha, Marinho e Sales” estariam ligados por meio de laranjas
O Ministério Público Federal (MPF), através do vice-procurador-geral da República, Luciano Mariz Maia, ofereceu ao Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) denúncia crime contra a desembargadora cearense Sérgia Maria Mendonça Miranda por fraude envolvendo a massa falida da Simcol.
Ela despachou liminar e ordenou, indevidamente (em um de seus plantões), o pagamento de cheque no valor de R$ 1.119.932,01 (hum milhão, cento e dezenove mil, novecentos e trinta e dois reais e um centavo) ao escritório “Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria”, que, na época, em maio de 2013, havia prestado serviços advocatícios à empresa.
Além de Sérgia, estão enrolados Frankraley Oliveira Gomes – namorado da desembargadora à época -, Paulo Fernando Mendonça e Cláudia Adrienne Sampaio de Oliveira.
Confira trecho da denúncia do MPF
Parceria Laranja
A SIMCOL teria sido também prejudicada, de forma criminosa, através de outra liminar da mesma desembargadora. A empresa foi forçada a efetuar o pagamento de valores altíssimos (superiores a R$ 1 milhão) ao escritório de advocacia “Rocha, Marinho e Sales”, pertencente ao advogado Caio Asfor.
O pagamento se deu por meio de um “laranja” ligado ao escritório “Sampaio, Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria”.
A denúncia foi encaminhada ao ministro do STJ, Herman Benjamin, pelo empresário Gilberto Martins Borges, sócio majoritário e representante da empresa falida.
Documento de Gilberto Borges
THE END
BRADO EM UNÍSSONO/THE CRY IN UNISON: #Brazilian Democracy Dies in Darkness: #ON DAY 02/... http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com/2018/02/brazilian-democracy-dies-in-darkness-on.html?spref=tw
==//==
Seu email foi enviado para seu amigo.
Voltar para onde você estava:
http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/brazilian-democracy-dies-in-darkness-on.html
BRADO EM UNÍSSONO/THE CRY IN UNISON: #ON DAY 02/21 ACTION IN FAVOR PARALLEL PAPER TRAIL... http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com/2018/02/jingle-sobre-o-voto-impresso-movimento_12.html?spref=tw
==//==
Seu email foi enviado para seu amigo.
Voltar para onde você estava:
http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/jingle-sobre-o-voto-impresso-movimento_12.html
BRADO EM UNÍSSONO/THE CRY IN UNISON: How Hackers Broke Into U.S. Voting Machines in Les... http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com/2018/02/urnas-eletronicas-nao-passam-no-teste_12.html?spref=tw
==//==
Seu email foi enviado para seu amigo.
Voltar para onde você estava:
http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/urnas-eletronicas-nao-passam-no-teste_12.html
It addresses our interests this way, for a transparent, auditable electoral system that ordinary individuals can monitor. (Whatsapp Full Federalism Group)
LINK: http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/brazilian-democracy-dies-in-darkness-on.html
LINK:http://bradoemunissono.blogspot.com.br/2018/02/brazilian-democracy-dies-in-darkness-on.html
#Brazilian Democracy Dies in Darkness
#ON DAY 02/21 ACTION IN FAVOR PARALLEL PAPER TRAIL- A PRINTED PAPER RECORD VOTERS/HACKERS FACILITIES TO BREAK INTO U.S. VOTING MACHINES AT THE ANNUAL DEFCON/#THE ONGOING OF SIMCOL ISSUE AND OTHER RELATED NEWS
SEE VIDEO: https://youtu.be/KjuQ41M_gDg
QUOTE OF THE DAY ON BRAZILIAN ELECTION TRANSPARENCY…
February 9, 2018 “Convergencias-Convergência”
"I do not want to audit the ballot in Brazil. I really want to audit the votes, only ensured with parallel paper trail-a printed paper record voters !
"(Maria Regina Monte - Facebook)
Sentence before the "providence" taken by Minister Fux to audit the software and electronic ballot boxes shortly before elections, reported yesterday, 08/02/18, in Folha de São Paulo.
Previous
PRELIMINARY AUDIT ON ELECTRONIC BALLOTS – THAT’S, IN FACT A JOKE
Next
ADGRESS OF THE PGR IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
1 Comment
Maria R S Farjallat
February 9, 2018 at 5:02 PM
#ON DAY 02/21 ACTION IN FAVOR PARALLEL PAPER TRAIL-
A PRINTED PAPER RECORD VOTERS
February 12, 2018 Convergences Convergence 0
The “Rua Brasil” Movement has already confirmed that on February 21, at 5:00 pm, in front of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (STF), there will be a parallel paper trail - a printed paper record voters or ballot paper demonstration, that is, an auditable vote.
The Movement can be found on Facebook link: <https://www.facebook.com/pagerua/>. The leader is Ray Alves.
As we receive more information about other cities, we'll post them on this page, mark the follow-up!
Watch the video produced by Rua Brasil:
Previous
The Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADIN) OF The Brazilian Federal Prosecutions Office (PGR) IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Be the first to comment
Leave an answer
Your email address will not be published.
Comment
==//==
SOURCE/LINK: http://www.vianoticias.blog.br/mpf-denuncia-sergia-miranda-fraude-na-simcol-deve-investigar-caio-asfor/
MPF(Brazilian Federal Prosecutions Office) denounces Sérgia Miranda for fraud at Simcol and should investigate Caio Asfor
November 27, 2017 Walter Bardawil
Offices "Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria" and "Rocha, Marinho e Sales" would be linked by means of operating behind a particular type naive person offering to represent another in an illegal activity "straw" man (in portuguese “laranjas”)
The Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF), through the Deputy Attorney General, Luciano Mariz Maia, offered the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) a crime against the Sérgia Maria Mendonça Miranda district attorney for fraud involving the failed bankruptcy of Simcol (building company undergoing bankruptcy).
She dispatched an injunction and wrongly ordered (in one of her shifts) the payment of a check in the amount of one million, one hundred and nineteen thousand, nine hundred and thirty-two reais and one centavo to the office "Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria", which, at the time, in May 2013, had provided legal services to the company.
In addition to Sérgia, Frankraley Oliveira Gomes - boyfriend of the judge at the time -, Paulo Fernando Mendonça and Claudia Adrienne Sampaio de Oliveira are enrolled.
Check out excerpt from MPF complaint.
Orange Partnership
SIMCOL would also have been harmed, in a criminal manner, through another injunction of the same adjudicator. The company was forced to pay very high amounts (over R $ 1 million) to the law firm "Rocha, Marinho e Sales", owned by attorney Caio Asfor.
The payment was made by means of an "orange" connected to the "Sampaio, Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria" office.
The denunciation was sent to the Minister of STJ, Herman Benjamin, by the businessman Gilberto Martins Borges, majority partner and representative of the bankrupt company.
Part of the document of Gilberto Borges below.
==//==
It addresses our interests this way, for a transparent, auditable electoral system that ordinary individuals can monitor. (Whatsapp Full Federalism Group)
==//==
É de nosso interesse um sistema eleitoral transparente, auditável e que indivíduos comum possam fiscaliza-lo. (Grupo Federalismo Pleno do Whatsapp)
==//==
SOURCE/LINK: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/02/09/why-paper-ballots-are-the-best-safeguard-against-election-hacking/?utm_term=.5811d9c64be1
Democracy Dies in Darkness
•
• Sections
• Subscribe
• Sign In
• Accessibility for screenreader
DemocracyPost
Opinion
The best safeguard against election hacking
By Brian Klaas February 9
Voters cast their votes during the U.S. presidential election in Medina, Ohio, on Nov. 8, 2016. (Aaron Josefczyk/Reuters)
This week, the U.S. government confirmed that Russian hackers infiltrated voting systems in several states, having targeted 21 of them. While there is currently no evidence suggesting any votes were changed, a hostile foreign power did gain access to voter registration databases — the vital foundation of election integrity. After all, if you control who can and cannot vote, you control a democracy.
America’s foolish experiment with digital voting processes must end. The Kremlin — or other hostile foreign actors — will certainly strike again. It’s time for good old-fashioned paper to make a comeback.
Researchers at Princeton University have shown that they can pick the lock on voting machines in seven seconds. In minutes, they could have replaced the machine’s chip with a malicious one, ensuring that voters who voted for candidate A were recorded as having voted for candidate B. Thankfully, their demonstrations were just for research. But they could have been real.
The story must be told.
Your subscription supports journalism that matters.
Try 1 month for $1
All Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting machines are vulnerable to local (in-person) hacking. Some can also be hacked remotely, over the Internet. These vulnerabilities are particularly glaring for machines without a voter-verified paper audit trail, which enables voters to see their vote choice on a piece of paper and verify that their vote was recorded correctly.
DRE voting machines without any paper trail whatsoever are in use in 15 different states. About 1 in 5 voters cast a ballot without any sort of verified paper trail. Even if foul play were suspected, it would be virtually impossible to audit the tally, because the only recorded votes would be on the compromised machine itself.
The least secure models, such as WinVote, can be hacked remotely over WiFi. In recent investigations, researchers found that some administrator accounts had a password that was “admin.” Many machines were found to be running outdated Windows XP software. In some cases, software hadn’t been updated since 2004.
Recent illustrations of these vulnerabilities have been darkly comic. One research team hacked into a voting machine to have it play the Pac-Man game. Another programmed the system to play the University of Michigan fight song every time a vote was cast. Last summer, a group of hackers “Rick-rolled” a voting machine, programming it to play Rick Astley’s iconic 1980s hit “Never Gonna Give You Up.” These tweaks were simple. They took minutes. And they were virtually undetectable, despite manufacturers’ claims that the machines are secure and feature “tamper-evident” seals.
If a few amateur hackers could turn a voting machine into a game, think of how Russia, Iran or a nonstate group of hackers could play with our democracy.
In U.S. elections, there are three main areas of digital vulnerability: the voter registration database (who can vote); the voting machines themselves (who people vote for); and the tabulation (the government’s count). Malicious hackers or agents could delete groups of voters from registration databases. They could program DRE machines to switch votes. It is even possible to tamper with optical scan machines, which scan paper ballots and record tallies, so they miscount. Malicious agents could change election outcomes by manipulating official result tallies on government websites.
Donald Trump is president because a small number of voters — so few that they could fit in a single football stadium — were the deciding factor in just three states. It’s not hard to imagine how easy it would be to change a small number of votes in several strategically located precincts and steal an election.
Worse, a hostile foreign actor wouldn’t even have to change the result to severely damage U.S. democracy. Imagine if evidence emerged that even a handful of voting machines had been hacked in Michigan, Pennsylvania or Wisconsin in 2016. If that happened, it wouldn’t be necessary to show that the result changed; it would destroy Americans’ confidence in the electoral process regardless. A cloud of illegitimacy would hang over the U.S. government for years. And all it would take is a single cunning Kremlin agent visiting a few unguarded precincts in a swing state and installing new chips or a bit of malware.
Virginia rightly took 2016 as a wake-up call and retired its vulnerable DRE machines. But that’s not good enough. The federal government should mandate that all elections must, at a minimum, be able to produce an independently verified paper trail for every election held at the state and local level.
Moreover, only 32 states mandate post-election audits (of varying quality and rigor). It must be 50.
Thankfully, a bipartisan group of six senators is championing legislation to secure our elections. There’s no time to waste. The politicians that Americans choose in elections make decisions that affect the lives of billions of people. Do we really want to cede that choice to the Kremlin or Iran or even a cyberterrorist group?
President Trump’s response to Russian attacks on American democracy has been to praise Russian President Vladimir Putin, thank him for purging U.S. diplomats from Moscow and float the idea of forming a joint cybersecurity venture between Moscow and Washington. Trump has made clear that he is more interested in kowtowing to the Kremlin than safeguarding our republic.
Congress and state legislatures must not make the same mistake. Twenty-first-century elections require a return to a 1st century B.C. technology: paper.
98
Comments
==//==
How Hackers Broke Into U.S. Voting Machines in Less Than 2 Hours
Stay Connected
International
Bullet Trains Are Transforming the World's Biggest Migra...
Tech
BitGrail Cryptocurrency Exchange Claims $195 Million Los...
Entertainment
Fifty Shades Freed Leads Three New Films at Weeke...
Finance
The Equifax Hack Exposed More Data Than Previously Repor...
1. Tech
2. Mastering Data
How Hackers Broke Into U.S. Voting Machines in Less Than 2 Hours
Courtesy of Cylance
By Barb Darrow
July 31, 2017
It took computer hackers less than two hours to break into U.S. voting machines at the annual DefCon computer security conference, according to tech news site The Register. DefCon is an annual event that draws hackers from all over the world to Las Vegas to strut their stuff.
The idea behind this effort was “to raise awareness and find out for ourselves what the deal is. I’m tired of reading misinformation about voting system security,” conference founder Jeff Moss noted, according to USA Today.
Some participants physically took machines apart to find and document vulnerabilities. Others gained remote access over Wi-Fi and were able to upload malware to them. DefCon organizers aggregated some 30 voting machines—including those made by Diebold, Sequoia, and WinVote—to make up its first-ever Voter Hacking Village, and turned them over to the pros on Friday to work their magic.
Get Data Sheet, Fortune’s technology newsletter
The wireless hacks are clearly more worrisome because of their stealthy nature. People are apt to notice someone taking a screwdriver to a polling place during an election.
Hackers testing the security of 30 voting machines at Defcon
"We got in within 35 minutes" pic.twitter.com/Zc9cKBXpD4#defcon #Defcon25 @defcon
— Matthijs Pontier (@Matthijs85) July 29, 2017
This is the first time that DefCon formally took on the issue of voting machine hacks—a hot topic given that U.S. intelligence agencies have found that Russians used hacking techniques to influence the last U.S. presidential election.
While there is no proof that actual vote count was compromised by the Russian efforts, there hasn’t been much research to see if that could happen. Danish researcher Carsten Schürmann used a 14-year old exploit in Microsoft (msft, +3.66%) Windows XP operating system to gain remote access to one unpatched machine within 90 minutes. That access would enable him to change the vote tally from anywhere, according to CNET.
Incredible. #votingvillage. Very recent #votingmachines being hacked. Some running Windows XP. Scary stuff. #defcon pic.twitter.com/rGYTel6oSC
— Micho Schumann (@MichoSchumann) July 29, 2017
“Without question, our voting systems are weak and susceptible,” said Jake Braun, CEO of security consulting firm Cambridge Global Advisors, told the Register. “Thanks to the contributions of the hacker community today, we’ve uncovered even more about exactly how.”
SPONSORED FINANCIAL CONTENT
You May Like
Leadership
Elon Musk Sent This Classic Sci-Fi Novel Into Space on the Falcon Heavy
Autos
Uber’s Waymo Settlement Seen as a Win for New CEO
Tech
Bitcoin and Bug Bounties on the Hill, Apple and Cisco's Cyber Deal, iPhone Leak
Entertainment
MoviePass Continues Aggressive Growth Push With Limited-Time Theater-Plus-Streaming Bundle
Tech
Apple HomePod Launches With Big Sound—and Even Bigger Questions
Tech
Apple TV App Gets Live News Broadcasts from CNN, Fox News, and CNBC
Stories From
Canadian Pharma Billionaire And His Wife Were Murdered
marketwatch.com
The Next Bear Market Will Be ‘The Worst In Our Lifetime'
marketwatch.com
President Trump's Approval Rating Just Hit Yet Another N...
time.com
Judge Rules: Doctor Can't Practice, As She Doesn't Use A...
time.com
Apple Confirms All Macs And IOS Devices Affected By Secu...
time.com
Read More
Tech
Another Free Data Backup Option Bites The Dust
Tech
Why LinkedIn Is a Treasure Trove for Spies, Hackers, and...
Tech
This Startup Raked in $50 Million to Take on Salesforce
Tech
IBM Claims Big Breakthrough in Deep Learning
Sign Up for Our Newsletters
Sign up now to receive FORTUNE's best content, special offers, and much more.
SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe & Save
Subscribe today and save 79% off the cover price.
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Sign Up for Our Newsletters
Sign up now to receive FORTUNE's best content, special offers, and much more.
SUBSCRIBE
• 40 Under 40
• 100 Best Companies to Work For
• Fortune 500
• Global 500
• Most Powerful Women in Business
• World's 50 Greatest Leaders
• World's Most Admired Companies
• All Rankings
• Home
• Automotive
• Careers
• Design
• Energy & Environment
• Executive Travel
• Finance
• Commentary
• Health
• International
• Leadership
• Luxury
• Markets
• Most Powerful Women
• Retail
• Sports
• Technology
• The Ledger
• Venture
• Photography
• Podcasts
• Videos
• Newsletters
• Magazine
• Fortune Knowledge Group
• Fortune Data Store
• Fortune Conferences
• TIME Health
• Customer Service
• Site Map
• Privacy Policy
• Advertising
• Subscribe
• Give a Gift
• Ad Choices
• Terms of Use
• Your California Privacy Rights
• Time Inc. Careers
© 2017 Time Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy (Your California Privacy Rights).
Fortune may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Interactive Data. ETF and Mutual Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Dow Jones Terms & Conditions: http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/html/tandc/indexestandcs.html.
S&P Index data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.
==//==
DIA 21/02 AÇÕES PELO VOTO IMPRESSO
12 de Fevereiro de 2018 Convergências Convergência 0
O Movimento Rua Brasil já confirmou que no dia 21/02, às 17h, na frente do STF, haverá manifestação pelo voto impresso ou em cédula, ou seja, voto auditável.
O Movimento pode ser encontrado no Facebook. A líder é Ray Alves.
A medida em que recebermos mais informações sobre outras cidades, as postaremos nesta página, marque o acompanhamento!
Veja o vídeo produzido pelo Rua Brasil:
Previous
A ADIN DA PGR É INCONSTITUCIONAL!
Seja o primeiro a comentar
Deixe uma resposta
Seu email não será publicado.
Comentário
Frase do dia…
9 de Fevereiro de 2018 Convergências Convergência 1
“Não quero auditar a urna. Quero auditar os votos, e isso só com o voto impresso!” (Maria Regina Monte – Facebook)
Frase dita diante da “providência” tomada pelo Ministro Fux de auditar os softwares e urnas eletrônicas pouco antes de eleições, relatada ontem, 08/02/18, na Folha de São Paulo.
Previous
AUDITORIA PRÉVIA NAS URNAS ELETRÔNICAS – MAIS UMA PIADA
Next
A ADIN DA PGR É INCONSTITUCIONAL!
1 Comentário
1.
Maria R S Farjallat
9 de Fevereiro de 2018 em 17:02
Queremos eleições honestas passíveis de auditoria !!
Responder
Deixe uma resposta
Seu email não será publicado.
Comentário
Nome*
E-mail*
Website
Notifique-me sobre novos comentários por e-mail.
Notifique-me sobre novas publicações por e-mail.
Pesquisar por:
Convergências na Mídia
•
Convergência repercute no jornal O GLOBO
27 de setembro de 2016 0
Notícias recentes
• A ADIN DA PGR É INCONSTITUCIONAL!
• Frase do dia…
• AUDITORIA PRÉVIA NAS URNAS ELETRÔNICAS – MAIS UMA PIADA
• SERIA UM GRANDE “ACORDÃO” CONTRA O BRASIL?
• ENTÃO, ATÉ AGORA, FOI TUDO INCONSTITUCIONAL?
Comentários
• Maria R S Farjallat em Frase do dia…
• MARCOS SOUZA AMORIM em AUDITORIA PRÉVIA NAS URNAS ELETRÔNICAS – MAIS UMA PIADA
• vilson Scussel em SERIA UM GRANDE “ACORDÃO” CONTRA O BRASIL?
• Marcos Mariani em AUDITORIA PRÉVIA NAS URNAS ELETRÔNICAS – MAIS UMA PIADA
• sydney m. farrajota em SMARTMATIC FORA DO PREGÃO
Filtrar notícias por movimento
Filtrar notícias por movimento
MPF denuncia Sérgia Miranda por fraude na Simcol e deve investigar Caio Asfor
Novembro 27, 2017 Walter Bardawil
Escritórios “Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria” e “Rocha, Marinho e Sales” estariam ligados por meio de laranjas
O Ministério Público Federal (MPF), através do vice-procurador-geral da República, Luciano Mariz Maia, ofereceu ao Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) denúncia crime contra a desembargadora cearense Sérgia Maria Mendonça Miranda por fraude envolvendo a massa falida da Simcol.
Ela despachou liminar e ordenou, indevidamente (em um de seus plantões), o pagamento de cheque no valor de R$ 1.119.932,01 (hum milhão, cento e dezenove mil, novecentos e trinta e dois reais e um centavo) ao escritório “Sampaio e Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria”, que, na época, em maio de 2013, havia prestado serviços advocatícios à empresa.
Além de Sérgia, estão enrolados Frankraley Oliveira Gomes – namorado da desembargadora à época -, Paulo Fernando Mendonça e Cláudia Adrienne Sampaio de Oliveira.
Confira trecho da denúncia do MPF
Parceria Laranja
A SIMCOL teria sido também prejudicada, de forma criminosa, através de outra liminar da mesma desembargadora. A empresa foi forçada a efetuar o pagamento de valores altíssimos (superiores a R$ 1 milhão) ao escritório de advocacia “Rocha, Marinho e Sales”, pertencente ao advogado Caio Asfor.
O pagamento se deu por meio de um “laranja” ligado ao escritório “Sampaio, Tavares Advocacia e Consultoria”.
A denúncia foi encaminhada ao ministro do STJ, Herman Benjamin, pelo empresário Gilberto Martins Borges, sócio majoritário e representante da empresa falida.
Documento de Gilberto Borges
THE END
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário