[PORTUGUESES VERSION]
#S.O.S.OPERCARWASH&UNCONDITIONALSUPPORTFORANTI-CORRUPTIONINSTITUTIONS
DESAFIOS E DENÚNCIAS RECENTES DO MPF
&
APOIO INCONDICIONAL AS INSTITUIÇÕES QUE LUTAM CONTRA
CORRUPÇÃO
SOURCE/LINK:http://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/e-uma-aberracao-diz-procurador-sobre-mp-dos-acordos-de-leniencia-19249763
‘É uma aberração’, diz procurador sobre MP dos acordos de leniência
Procurador diz que tentativa de alterar lei é ataque direto à Lava-Jato
/ Atualizado
- Giuliano Gomes / Agência O Globo
SÃO
PAULO, CURITIBA — O procurador Deltan Dallagnoll criticou duramente nesta
sexta-feira o relatório do deputado Paulo Teixeira (PT-SP) sobre a Medida
Provisória 703/2015
(http://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/124535/pdf),
que altera as regras do acordo de leniência, apresentado na última terça-feira
à Comissão Especial Mista da Câmara e do Senado. Dallagnoll afirmou que o
relatório é "um ataque direto à Lava-Jato" e que a investigação pode
sofrer ataques em várias frentes. A votação do relatório foi adiada para o
próximo dia 10 e o prazo final da comissão é 29 de maio. A relatora revisora da
MP é a senadora Gleisi Hoffmann (PT-PR), investigada na Lava-Jato.
-
É uma aberração - afirmou Dallagnol, um dos porta-vozes da força-tarefa da
Lava-Jato.
Dallagnol
afirmou que, se aprovada a Medida Provisória, o crime de cartel, como o que
ocorreu na Petrobras, deixará de ser considerado crime de corrupção. Além
disso, permitirá que as empresas possam apenas pagar multas para compensar
ilícitos, sem que reconheçam ter cometido crimes, o que desestimula a entrega
de fatos novos que possam ser investigados.
Veja também
-
Isso significa que um acordo feito num município, com um advogado contratado
pelo prefeito, pode impedir que seja aberta uma ação de improbidade - afirmou o
procurador.
Ao
apresentar mais duas denúncias à Justiça Federal de Curitiba, contra
o ex-senador Gim Argello e o empresário Ronan Maria Pinto, além de outras 18 pessoas, Dallagnol afirmou que é
preciso refletir e repensar a República, pois o Brasil vive uma inundação de
corrupção e é necessário que haja uma reação institucional, com "muros que
nos protejam", como a reforma do sistema de Justiça e a reforma política.
-
O envolvimento de pessoas de tamanha importância em crimes tão graves na nossa
República nos faz repensar o próprio funcionamento dela. Estamos vivendo uma
inundação de corrupção e tirando essa água com baldes. Precisamos de barragens,
muros que nos protejam dessa inundação, e isso só vai acontecer com a reforma
do sistema de Justiça e com uma reforma política consistente - afirmou
Dallagnol
afirmou que, dois anos após o início da Lava-Jato, preocupa ao Ministério
Público que não exista nenhum movimento concreto em defesa dessas reformas.
-
Carecemos de líderes que levantem essas bandeiras. Se isso não acontecer, vamos
continuar enxugando gelo e dando murro em ponta de faca - disse ele.
No
relatório do deputado Paulo Teixeira, o acordo de leniência passa a ser firmado
pelos “órgãos de controle interno, de forma isolada ou em conjunto com o
Ministério Público ou com a Advocacia Pública”. Ou seja, passam a negociar diretamente
com as empresas envolvidas. O relatório exclui a exigência de as empresas
apresentarem documentos de "forma célere" e passa a prever isenção de
penas que embaracem a participação das empresas em licitações públicas ou as
impeçam de celebrar contratos administrativos; proíbe que se aplique às
empresas que fecharem acordo “qualquer outra sanção de natureza pecuniária
decorrente das infrações especificadas no acordo” e a multa é reduzida em até
dois terços. Caso a empresa seja a primeira a firmar um acordo, é possível
eliminar totalmente o pagamento de multas.
Outra
mudança é que o acordo de leniência feito com as advocacias públicas passam a
inviabilizar o ajuizamento ou prosseguimento de ações civis e com base na lei
anticorrupção.
A
Procuradora-Geral da República pediu a suspensão da eficácia da MP ao Supremo
Tribunal Federal na ação direta de inconstitucionalidade movida pelo PPS. A MP
703 foi assinada pela presidente Dilma Rousseff e publicada no Diário Oficial
da União no dia 21 de dezembro do ano passado.
Newsletter
As
principais notícias do dia no seu e-mail.
Já
recebe a newsletter diária? Veja mais opções.
Últimas
da Editoria
Em
destaque agora no Globo
ñ
Brasil
ñ
Brasil
ñ
Brasil
==//==
- Atualizado em
Gleisi Hoffmann e Paulo Bernardo são denunciados por Janot na Lava Jato
O casal e mais um empresário são acusados
de corrupção e lavagem.
Defesa alega que Gleisi e o marido não receberam propina do esquema.
Mariana
OliveiraDa TV Globo, em Brasília
O procurador-geral da
República, Rodrigo
Janot, denunciou ao Supremo
Tribunal Federal (STF), em um dos processos
da Operação Lava Jato, a senadora Gleisi Hoffmann (PT-PR), o marido dela, o
ex-ministro do Planejamento e das Comunicações Paulo Bernardo, e o empresário
Ernesto Kugler, ligado ao casal.
ñ conexões
Os
três são acusados de corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro por suposto
recebimento de valores desviados da Petrobras para a campanha de Gleisi ao Senado em 2010. Janot
afirma na denúncia que delações premiadas da Lava Jato e provas obtidas a
partir delas apontam indícios suficientes do envolvimento do trio em atos de
corrupção.
Senadora
de primeiro mandato, Gleisi é uma das principais defensoras da presidente Dilma
Rousseff no Congresso Nacional. A petista chegou a chefiar a Casa Civil no
primeiro mandato de Dilma, mas deixou o primeiro escalão para concorrer ao
governo do Paraná, em 2014. Ela acabou na terceira colocação da disputa
eleitoral. Atualmente, a parlamentar paranaense integra a comissão especial do
impeachment no Senado.
Ex-deputado
federal pelo Paraná, Paulo Bernardo comandou o Ministério do Planejamento na gestão do
ex-presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Em 2011, quando Dilma sucedeu Lula no
Palácio do Planalto, Paulo Bernardo permaneceu no governo, mas trocou de pasta,
transferindo-se para o Ministério das Comunicações. Ele deixou a Esplanada dos
Ministérios somente ao final do primeiro mandato de Dilma.
Relator
dos processos da Lava Jato no STF, o ministro Teori Zavascki terá de submeter a
denúncia da PGR à análise da Segunda Turma do tribunal, composta por cinco magistrados.
Se
os ministros decidirem receber a denúncia, Gleisi e Paulo Bernardo vão virar
réus na ação penal. O caso está tramitando no Supremo porque Gleisi tem foro
privilegiado por ser senadora.
Se
Gleisi, Paulo Bernardo e o empresário Ernesto Kugler se tornarem réus, terá
início, então, a fase de coleta de provas e testemunhos. Só depois de concluída
a etapa de instrução e produção de provas é que o Supremo julgará se eles serão
condenados ou absolvidos.
saiba mais
A acusação
Segundo o Ministério Público, Gleisi é acusada de receber R$ 1 milhão em propina do esquema de corrupção que atuava na Petrobras. A senadora petista foi citada nas delações premiadas do doleiro Alberto Yousseff e do ex-diretor da Petrobras Paulo Roberto Costa.
De
acordo com os relatos dos dois delatores, houve pagamento indevido de R$ 1
milhão para a campanha de Gleisi ao Senado, em 2010. Yousseff e Costa afirmam
que o dinheiro foi repassado a pedido de Paulo Bernardo, que, à época, estava à
frente do Ministério do Planejamento.
O
doleiro contou aos procuradores da República que o pedido de recursos foi feito
por Ernesto Kugler Rodrigues, amigo do casal. O empresário nega ter atuado na
campanha da senadora.
Antonio
Carlos Pieruccini, um novo delator da Lava Jato, disse que transportou a
propina para Gleisi, em dinheiro em espécie, de São Paulo para Curitiba em
quatro viagens. Pieruccini afirmou que entregou o dinheiro para Ernesto Kugler.
“Indagado
acerca dos fatos constantes do anexo 01 (senadora Gleisi
Hoffmann) afirmou: que, em 2010, o
declarante transportou R$ 1.000.000,00 (um milhão de reais) de São Paulo para
Curitiba, a pedido de Alberto Yousseff; que Alberto Yousseff disse que os
valores se destinavam à então candidata à senadora Gleisi Hoffmann; que Alberto
Yousseff disse que os valores seriam usados para o financiamento da campanha de
Gleisi Hoffmann; que a conversa inicial com Alberto Yousseff ocorreu
provavelmente em fevereiro ou março”, relata trecho da delação premiada de
Pieruccini.
Indiciamento
No fim de março, Gleisi Hoffmann e o marido dela foram indiciados pela Polícia Federal (PF) por corrupção passiva. O indiciamento consiste numa conclusão do delegado de polícia acerca das suspeitas sobre um investigado e, em geral, precede a formulação de denúncia pelo Ministério Público, que pode ou não concordar com as conclusões da PF.
No fim de março, Gleisi Hoffmann e o marido dela foram indiciados pela Polícia Federal (PF) por corrupção passiva. O indiciamento consiste numa conclusão do delegado de polícia acerca das suspeitas sobre um investigado e, em geral, precede a formulação de denúncia pelo Ministério Público, que pode ou não concordar com as conclusões da PF.
A
investigação da Polícia Federal concluiu que há indícios suficientes de que a
campanha da petista ao Senado recebeu R$ 1 milhão em recursos desviados da
Petrobras.
O
indiciamento da senadora do PT, entretanto, é alvo de questionamento porque o
STF decidiu, em 2006, que parlamentares não podem ser indiciados pela polícia.
Em abril, o procurador-geral da República chegou a enviar parecer ao tribunal contestando
o indiciamento de Gleisi pela PF. Para o
chefe do Ministério Público, os inquéritos criminais que tramitam na Suprema
Corte envolvendo autoridades públicas não podem ser objeto de indiciamento.
A senadora Gleisi Hoffmann (PT-PR) e o seu
marido, o ex-ministro Paulo Bernardo (Foto: Antonio Cruz / Agência Brasil e
Reprodução EPTV)
O que disseram as defesas dos suspeitos
Por meio de nota, os advogados Rodrigo Mudrovitsch e Veronica Abdala Sterman disseram ter recebido com "inconformismo" a denúncia da senador a do PT (leia a íntegra do comunicado ao final desta reportagem). Segundo os defensores, as provas obtidas no inquérito comprovam que ela não recebeu propina do esquema de corrupção.
Por meio de nota, os advogados Rodrigo Mudrovitsch e Veronica Abdala Sterman disseram ter recebido com "inconformismo" a denúncia da senador a do PT (leia a íntegra do comunicado ao final desta reportagem). Segundo os defensores, as provas obtidas no inquérito comprovam que ela não recebeu propina do esquema de corrupção.
"[A
denúncia] baseia-se apenas em especulações que não são compatíveis com o que se
espera de uma acusação penal", diz trecho do comunicado.
Rodrigo
Mudrovitsch e Veronica Abdala Sterman também são responsáveis pela defesa de
Paulo Bernardo. Em outra nota, os criminalistas afirmaram que as referências ao
ex-ministro na denúncia se baseiam em "declarações contraditórias e
inverossímeis".
"Não
houve qualquer envolvimento dele com os fatos narrados na denúncia.
Demonstraremos isso com veemência e acreditamos que a denúncia não pode ser
recebida", enfatizam os advogados na nota.
Responsável
pela defesa do empresário Ernesto Kugler, o advogado Cal Garcia afirmou ao G1 que não iria comentar a
denúncia da Procuradoria Geral da República.
Leia
a íntegra das notas divulgadas pela defesa dos suspeitos
Nota divulgada pela defesa de Gleisi
Hoffmann
É com inconformismo que recebemos a notícia
de que o PGR apresentou denúncia em desfavor da senadora Gleisi Hoffmann.
Todas as provas que constam no inquérito
comprovam que não houve solicitação, entrega ou recebimento de nenhum valor por
parte da Senadora. A denúncia sequer aponta qualquer ato concreto cometido.
Baseia-se apenas em especulações que não são compatíveis com o que se espera de
uma acusação penal.
São inúmeras as contradições nos
depoimentos dos delatores que embasam a denúncia, as quais tiram toda a
credibilidade das supostas delações. Um deles apresentou, nada mais, nada
menos, do que seis versões diferentes para esses fatos, o que comprova ainda
mais que eles não existiram.
Ao apagar das luzes, depois de um ano e
meio da abertura do inquérito, uma terceira pessoa aparece disposta a dizer que
teria realizado a suposta entrega de valores, numa nova versão que foge de
qualquer raciocínio lógico. Vale lembrar que esta pessoa é amigo/sócio/
funcionário de Alberto Youssef, o que comprova ainda mais a fragilidade das
provas e se vale do mesmo advogado de Alberto Youssef para fazer sua delação.
Rodrigo Mudrovitsch e Veronica Abdala
Sterman
Nota divulgada pela defesa de Paulo
Bernardo
As referências ao ex-ministro Paulo
Bernardo na denúncia baseiam-se em declarações contraditórias e inverossímeis.
Não houve qualquer envolvimento dele com os fatos narrados na denúncia.
Demonstraremos isso com veemência e acreditamos que a denúncia não pode ser
recebida.
Rodrigo
Mudrovitsch e Verônica Sterman
tópicos:
ñ Paulo Bernardo ,
ñ Petrobras,
==//== ==//==
[ENGLISH VERSION]
#SOSOPERCARWASH&UNCONDITIONALSUPPORTFORANTI-CORRUPTIONINSTITUTIONS
BRAZILIAN FEDERAL PUBLIC PROSECUTION-MP'S
&
AND RECENT
ACCUSATIONS
SOURCE/LINK:http://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/e-uma-aberracao-diz-procurador-sobre-mp-dos-acordos-de-leniencia-19249763
LINK OF Provisional Measure: http://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/124535/pdf
"It is an aberration," says attorney on MP of leniency agreements
Attorney says that trying to change law is direct attack on the Lava-Jato
by Cleide Carvalho and Luigi Poniwass, especially for GLOBE
/ Updated
- Giuliano Gomes / Agência O Globo
Advertising
SAO PAULO, CURITIBA - The prosecutor Deltan Dallagnoll harshly criticized on Friday the Deputy Paulo Teixeira's report (PT-SP) on the Provisional Measure 703/2015 amending the rules of the leniency agreement presented last Tuesday Special Joint Committee of the House and Senate. Dallagnoll said the report is "a direct attack on Operation Car Wash" and that the investigation may come under attack on several fronts. The report of the vote was postponed to the next day 10 and the deadline of the commission is May 29. The proofreader and also rapporteur MP is Senator Gleisi Hoffmann (PT-PR), investigated in Operation Car Wash.
- It is an aberration - said
Dallagnol, one of the spokesmen of the task force of Operation Car Wash.
Dallagnol said that if
approved the Provisional Measure (MP), the cartel crimes as what happened in Petrobras, will no longer
be considered a crime of corruption. Also, it allows businesses to
only pay fines to offset illegal without recognizing committing crimes, which
discourages the delivery of new facts that can be investigated.
See too
MPF denounces former senator
Gim Argello and Ronan Maria Pinto
Wedge departure from the Chamber unites opposite sides of the political Cervero accuses Cunha and Henrique Alves pressing BR to buy refinery
The MP 703 allows leniency agreements are made directly with the public advocacy without participation of the prosecution, and prevents the sharing evidence with criminal investigations. Another change is in relation to leniency agreements, which may not be signed with accused who are arrested.
- This means that an agreement
made in a municipality with a lawyer hired by the mayor, can prevent to open
one dishonesty action - said the prosecutor.
During the presentation of two
more complaints to the Federal Court of Curitiba, against former Senator Gim
Argello and businessman Ronan Maria Pinto, and other 18 people, Dallagnol
said it is necessary to think and rethink the Republic, because Brazil is
experiencing a flood of corruption and there needs to be an institutional
response, with "protection walls to ourselves", as the reform of the
justice system and political reform.
- The involvement of people of
such importance in such serious crimes in our Republic makes us rethink the
very functioning of it. We are living in a flood of corruption and taking the
water with buckets. We need dams, walls to protect us from this flood, and this
will only happen with the reform of the justice system and a consistent policy
reform - said
Dallagnol said that two years after the start of Operation Car Wash, concerns the prosecutor that there is no concrete movement in defense of these reforms.
- We lack leaders who holds these flags. If not, we will do continue figuratively going to dry up ice and fighting a courageous battle - he said.
Dallagnol said that two years after the start of Operation Car Wash, concerns the prosecutor that there is no concrete movement in defense of these reforms.
- We lack leaders who holds these flags. If not, we will do continue figuratively going to dry up ice and fighting a courageous battle - he said.
Advertising
The Deputy Paulo Teixeira's report,the leniency agreement is to be signed by "organs of internal control, alone or in conjunction with the Public Ministry or the Public Advocacy". That is, start to negotiate directly with the companies involved. The report excludes the requirement that companies submit to "swiftly" documents and now provides for exemption from penalties that embarrasing business participation in public tenders or prevent them from concluding administrative contracts; prohibits that applies to companies that close agreement "any other sanction of a pecuniary nature resulting from the offenses specified in the agreement" and the fine is reduced by up to two thirds. If the company is the first to sign an agreement, you can completely eliminate the payment of fines.
Another change is that the leniency agreement made with public advocacies start to derail the filing or prosecution of civil actions and based on the anti-corruption law.
The Attorney General of the Republic requested the suspension of the Provisional Measure (MP 703/2015) of the Supreme Court on the direct action of unconstitutionality filed by the Party of Progress and Socialism (PPS). The MP 703 was signed by President Dilma Rousseff and published in the Official Gazette on 21 December last year.
==//==
05/07/2016 10h41 - 14h05 Updated 05/07/2016
Gleisi Hoffmann and Paul Bernardo are denounced by Janot in Operation Car Wash
Gleisi Hoffmann and Paul Bernardo are denounced by Janot in Operation Car Wash
The couple and another
businessman are accused of corruption and laundering.
Defense claims that Gleisi and her husband did not receive kickback scheme.
Mariana Oliveira Da TV Globo in Brasilia
The Attorney General of the Republic, Rodrigo Janot, denounced the Supreme Court (STF), one of the Operation Lava jet processes, Senator Gleisi Hoffmann (PT-PR), her husband, the former Minister of Planning and communications Paulo Bernardo, and the businessman Ernesto Kugler on the couple.
OPERATION CAR WASH corruption scheme
Video: the schemechronology
Video: Understand the operation
Video: plea bargaining
which is suspected, accused and defendant
convicted
snitches
politicians
connections
The three are accused of passive corruption and money laundering for alleged receipt of diverted values of Petrobras for Gleisi campaign to the Senate in 2010. Janot said in the complaint that winning vigilantism Lava Jet and evidence obtained from them show enough evidence of involvement trio in acts of corruption.
Senator's first term, Gleisi is a leading advocate of President Rousseff in Congress. The Worker's Party (PT) came to head the Civil House Dilma in the first term, but left the first step to compete for the government of Paraná in 2014. She ended up third in the election. Currently, Paraná parliamentary integrates the special committee of impeachment in the Senate.
Former deputy federal by Paraná, Paulo Bernardo led the Ministry of Planning in the administration of former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. In 2011, when he succeeded Dilma Lula at the Planalto Palace, Paulo Bernardo remained in government, but changed folder, transferring to the Ministry of Communications. He left the Esplanade of Ministries only at the end of the first term of Mrs. Rousseff
Rapporteur of the Operation Car Wash proceedings in the Federal Supreme Court, the Minister Teori Zavascki must submit the complaint to the BRAZILIAN FEDERAL PUBLIC PROSECUTION (PGR) analysis of the Second Chamber of the Court, composed of five judges.
If ministers decide to receive the complaint, Gleisi and Paul Bernardo will become defendants in criminal proceedings. The case is being processed in the Supreme because Gleisi has special jurisdiction to be senator.
If Gleisi, Paul Bernardo and entrepreneur Ernesto Kugler become defendants, will start then the collection phase of evidence and testimony. Only after the completion of the instruction stage and production of evidence is that the Supreme judge whether they will be convicted or acquitted.
Know more
Gleisi denies the tribune of the Senate have received illicit money in the campaign Janot opines against 'indictment' of Gleisi Hoffmann in Operation Car Wash
Justice sees evidence against Gleisi in Operation Car Wash and sends documents to Supreme Federal Court (STF)
In testimony to the Federal Polie (PF), Gleisi Hoffmann denies having received bribes from Youssef The Accusation
According to the prosecution, Gleisi is accused of receiving US $ 1 million in bribes corruption scheme that worked in Petrobras. Senator PT was cited in vigilantism awarded the money changer Alberto Yousseff and former Petrobras director Paulo Roberto Costa.
According to the reports of the two informers, there was undue payment of $ 1 million to the Gleisi campaign to the Senate in 2010. Yousseff and Costa say the money was passed at the request of Paul Bernardo, who at the time was the head of the Ministry of Planning.
The money changer told prosecutors that the request for funds was made by Ernesto Rodrigues Kugler, friend of the couple. The businessman denies having acted in the senator's campaign.
Antonio Carlos Pieruccini, a new whistleblower Operation Car Wash said carried the bribe to Gleisi, in cash, from São Paulo to Curitiba in four trips. Pieruccini said that he gave money to Ernesto Kugler.
"Asked about the facts contained in Annex 01 (Senator Gleisi Hoffmann) said: that in 2010, the declarant transported R$ 1,000,000.00 (one million reais) from Sao Paulo to Curitiba, at the request of Alberto Yousseff; Alberto Yousseff said the figures were for the then candidate Senator Gleisi Hoffmann; Alberto Yousseff said the figures would be used to finance the Gleisi Hoffmann campaign; the initial conversation with Alberto Yousseff probably occurred in February or March, "reports section of plea bargaining of Pieruccini.
Indictment
In late March, Gleisi Hoffmann and her husband were indicted by the Federal Police (PF) for passive corruption. The indictment is a conclusion of the police chief about the suspicions about one investigated and generally precedes the complaint formulation by the public prosecutor, who may or may not agree with the conclusions of the PF.
The Federal Police investigation concluded that there is sufficient evidence that the campaign of the PT in the Senate received R $ 1 million in embezzled funds from Petrobras.
The indictment of the PT senator, however, is a question mark because the Supreme Court decided in 2006 that parliamentarians can not be charged by the police. In April, the attorney general's office came to send opinion to the court contesting the indictment of Gleisi by Federal Police (PF). For the head of the prosecution, the criminal investigations filed at the Supreme Court involving public authorities can not be indicted object.
Senator Gleisi Hoffmann (PT-PR) and her husband, former Minister Paulo Bernardo (Photo: Antonio Cruz / Brazil Agency and Playback EPTV)
Senator Gleisi Hoffmann (PT-PR) and her husband, former Minister Paulo Bernardo (Photo: Antonio Cruz / Brazil Agency and Playback EPTV)
What said the defenses of suspects
Through note, Rodrigo Mudrovitsch and Veronica Abdala Sterman lawyers said they received to "nonconformity" the complaint of Senator the PT (read the full text of the statement at the end of this report). According to proponents, the evidence obtained during the investigation show that it has not received bribes corruption scheme.
"[The complainant] is based only on speculation that are not compatible with what is expected of a criminal charge", says the statement section.
Rodrigo Mudrovitsch and Veronica Abdala Sterman are also responsible for the defense of Paul Bernardo. On another note, criminologists said that references to former minister in the complaint are based on "contradictory statements and implausible."
"There was no involvement with the facts described in the complaint. We will demonstrate this with vehemence and we believe that the complaint can not be received", emphasize the lawyers in the note.
Responsible for defending the businessman Ernesto Kugler, lawyer Cal Garcia told G1 that he would not comment on the complaint of the Attorney General's Office.
Read the full notes released by defense of suspects
Statement issued by the defense Gleisi Hoffmann
It is with nonconformity we received the news that the PGR presented a complaint to the detriment of Gleisi Hoffmann senator.
All evidence in the investigation show that there was no request, delivery or receive any value from the Senator. The complaint points even any concrete act committed. It is based only on speculation that are not compatible with what is expected of a criminal charge.
There are numerous contradictions in the testimonies of whistleblowers that support the complaint, which take all the credibility of the alleged vigilantism. One of them had, no more and no less than six different versions to these facts, which further proves that they did not exist.
As the lights after a year and a half of the opening of the investigation, a third person appears willing to say that would have made the alleged delivery of values, a new version that escapes any logical reasoning. Remember that this person is a friend / partner / employee Alberto Youssef, which further proves the weakness of the evidence and draws the same Alberto Youssef's lawyer to make his accusation.
Rodrigo Mudrovitsch and Veronica Abdala Sterman
Statement issued by the defense Paulo Bernardo
References to former Minister Paulo Bernardo in the complaint are based on contradictory and implausible statements. There was no involvement with the facts described in the complaint. We will demonstrate this with vehemence and we believe that the complaint can not be received.
Rodrigo Mudrovitsch and Veronica Sterman
topics:
Gleisi Hoffmann, Paulo Bernardo, Petrobras, Rodrigo Janot, Federal Supreme Court (STF)
See also
Supreme Court decides to remove Judge Sergio Moro investigation of fraud in Planning Supreme Court decides to remove Judge Sergio Moro investigation of fraud in Planning
09/24/2015
Odebrecht would have bought new headquarters of the Lula Institute, says the PF report Odebrecht would have bought new headquarters of the Lula Institute, says the PF report 06/05/2016
Eduardo Cunha has biggest defeat in 13 years in the House of Representatives Eduardo Cunha has biggest defeat in 13 years in the House of Representatives
05/05/2016
Cunha had 15 months of controversy and complaints in front of the House Cunha had 15 months of controversy and complaints in front of the House 05/05/2016
==//== ==//==
SOURCE/LINK:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/04/brazil-chief-prosecutor-seeks-charges-for-rousseff-over-car-wash/
Brazil chief prosecutor 'seeks charges for Rousseff' over 'Car Wash' corruption probe
Ms Rousseff has repeatedly denied any wrongdoi
ng in relation to the
Petrobras scandal Credit: EVARISTO SAEVARISTO/AFP
Brazil’s most senior
prosecutor has reportedly filed a request at the Supreme Court to charge President
Dilma Rousseff over claims she obstructed the sprawling probe into corruption at
state oil giant Petrobras.
The move - the latest
blow to Ms Rousseff as she battles
against impeachment - was reported overnight by local media and is also believed to
implicate former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and José Cardozo, the
attorney general.
The request was submitted to
the Supreme Court justice overseeing the massive Lava Jato (“Car Wash”)
investigation, which has uncovered a multi-million dollar bribery scheme within
state-controlled oil company, Petrobras, according to Folha de Sao Paulo.
If he accepts the
request, which is reportedly related to allegations
she helped Mr Lula evade prosecution by giving him a cabinet post, the trio
will be formally charged and become defendants in a Supreme Court trial.
The reports emerged hours
before a senate commission was due to present its recommendations on the
impeachment case against Ms Rousseff.
Former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva Credit: Andre
Penner/AP
It is widely expected that senators will support her removal from office
over separate claims of manipulating government accounts when the
case goes
to a full vote next week.
Ms Rousseff has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in relation to the
Petrobras scandal, despite being chairman of the board at the time.
At an event for farmers on Tuesday, she insisted she would not give up
her mandate in the face of growing pressure.
“They asked me to resign many
times,” she said. “It is extremely convenient that the victim disappears, that
injustice is not visible.
“But I want to say something,
injustice will remain visible, very much visible.”
Earlier, Ms Rousseff had
welcomed the Olympic flame in Brasília, where it began its 95-day journey
around the country ahead of the Opening Ceremony in Rio de Janeiro on August 5.
Ms Rousseff with the Olympic flame in Brasília
Credit: EVARISTO SAEVARISTO/AFP
If she loses the senate vote,
she will be suspended for up to 180 days while a trial is held, and will be
replaced by her vice-president, Michel Temer, who would be in office during the
Olympics.
Meanwhile, the Supreme
Court will analyse the request to open proceedings against the president
in secret, as the claim is understood to be based on wiretapped phone calls
between Ms Rousseff and Mr Lula.
The recordings were
controversially released in March by Sergio Moro, the federal
judge who is leading the Car Wash investigation. In them, Ms Rousseff
appeared to suggest Mr Lula’s appointment as her chief of staff was a move to
protect him from prosecution.
Plea bargain testimony from
Senator Delcidio Amaral also claimed the president intervened in the corruption
inquiry.
Mr Cardozo, the attorney
general, said in a statement that the allegations made by the senator were
“absolutely frivolous and untruthful”.
ñ
1.
08 May 2016, 10:50am
©
Telegraph Media Group Limited 2016
==//==
ñ 04/05/2016 09h28
ñ Brasília
André
Richter reports from Agência Brasil
Rodrigo
Janot Antonio Cruz/Agência Brasil
Prosecutor-General Rodrigo
Janot has asked the Supreme Court (STF) to authorize investigations on
President Dilma Rousseff, former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and
Attorney-General José Eduardo Cardozo, in connection with a confidential
proceeding.
His request was prompted by
plea bargaining statements by Senator Delcídio do Amaral that Rousseff and Lula
had vested interests in appointing Marcelo Navarro as a Justice in the Superior
Court (STJ) to hobble Operation Car Wash investigations on the Petrobras corruption
scandal and its tentacles and putting jailed contractors at liberty. José
Eduardo Cardozo was the incumbent Minister of Justice then.
Learn More
It now lies with Justice Teori
Zavascki, the judge rapporteur on “Car Wash” proceedings in the Supreme Court,
to decide whether or not to initiate the requested investigation. It is not
known when the decision will be announced.
José Eduardo Cardozo issued a
note saying that Senator Delcídio do Amaral's statements are “frivolous lies.”
For him, “the investigation will only serve to prove that—once more—the senator
has not been telling the truth.” Cardozo also deplored that “once again, a
confidential investigation has been leaked even before any investigations took
place in connection with the false allegations made by the senator in his plea
bargaining testimony.”
In a note released around the
time Senator Amaral made his statements, Instituto Lula said that former
president Lula never engaged in any wrongdoing whether directly or indirectly,
and there have been “illegal leaks, unproven allegations, and groundless
accusations.”
THE END
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário