#BRICS’
WIN-WIN SOLUTION
TO NORTH KOREAN CRISIS
TO NORTH KOREAN CRISIS
MAINTENANCE
New
Delhi: Even as the United States warned of a “massive military
response” to North Korea’s test of a hydrogen bomb, Russia,
India, China, Brazil and South Africa – speaking as BRICS –
condemned Pyongyang’s action but also contradicted Washington by
stressing that a solution can only be reached peacefully through
“direct dialogue”.
SOURCE/LINK:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/brics-leaders-xiamen-declaration-full-text/articleshow/60359120.cms
44th
BRICS Leaders Xiamen Declaration. We strongly deplore the nuclear
test conducted by the DPRK. We express deep concern over the ongoing
tension and prolonged nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula, and
emphasize that it should only be settled through peaceful means and
direct dialogue of all the parties concerned.
SOURCE/LINK:
https://thewire.in/173927/trump-sabre-rattles-brics-calls-direct-dialogue-north-korea-nuclear-crisis/
THE WIRE - While Trump Sabre-Rattles, BRICS Calls for Direct Dialogue on North Korea Nuclear Crisis
By Devirupa Mitra on 04/09/2017 • Leave a CommentShare this:
In a repeat of the Amritsar ‘Heart of Asia’ declaration, the BRICS statement at Xiamen names the Lashkar, Jaish, TTP and other terrorist groups.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (C) takes a group photo with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (2nd L), Brazil’s President Michel Temer (L), Russian President Vladimir Putin (2nd R) and South Africa’s President Jacob Zuma at the West Lake State Guest House ahead of G20 Summit in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China, September 4, 2016. REUTERS/Wang Zhao
On
Sunday, the DPRK’s official Korean Central News Agency said
that the country had successfully carried out the test of a
hydrogen
bomb which could be mounted on an intercontinental ballistic
missile. This was the sixth nuclear test conducted by North Korea,
but the first during the Trump administration and the most powerful
till now.
Last
year in Goa,
the situation in the Korean peninsula was not on BRICS’s agenda.
This year, however, the leaders of Russia, China, India, Brazil and
South Africa, had no choice but to send out a message.
“We
strongly deplore the nuclear test conducted by the DPRK. We express
deep concern over the ongoing tension and prolonged nuclear issue on
the Korean Peninsula, and emphasize that it should only be settled
through peaceful means and direct dialogue of all the parties
concerned,” said the Xiamen
Declaration of the ninth BRICS summit.
The
North Korean nuclear test could not have come at a worse time for
China, the hermit nation’s only ally. China was looking to showcase
its diplomatic muscle at the BRICS summit, but the nuclear test
occurred as President Xi Jinping was delivering a major policy speech
in Xiamen.
In a
series of tweets, US president Donald Trump noted that the DPRK’s
“words and actions continue to be very hostile and dangerous to the
United States”.
He
asserted that North Korea “has become a great threat and
embarrassment to China, which is trying to help but with little
success”.
The
toughest message was delivered by US defence secretary James Mattis,
after a meeting with Trump, vice president Mike Pence and other top
advisors.
“Any
threat to the United States or its territories, including Guam, or
our allies will be met with a massive
military response, a response both effective and overwhelming,”
said Mattis.
He
claimed that the US was “not looking to the total annihilation of a
country, namely North Korea, but as I said, we have many options to
do so”.
Later,
Trump refused to rule out the military option. “We will see,”
replied Trump in answer to a question whether he will “attack North
Korea”.
Against
this backdrop, the underlining of “direct dialogue” and “peaceful
means” in the BRICS declaration on Monday was a clear indication of
how differently the grouping of five emerging economies wants
the situation handled.
The
Korean peninsula was on top of the mind when Xi met with Russian
President Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of the BRICS summit. As per
Xinhua, both countries agreed to “stick to the goal of
de-nuclearisation on the Korean Peninsula and keep close
communication and coordination to deal with the new situation”.
Earlier,
in their official reaction, China had expressed “resolute
opposition and strong condemnation” of the North Korean nuclear
test
The
Russian foreign ministry also condemned the tests, but warned against
any hasty steps. “In the unfolding conditions, it is imperative to
remain calm and to refrain from any actions that lead to a further
escalation of tension,” said the Russian statement.
Speaking
to reporters in Xiamen, Russia’s deputy foreign minister Sergey
Ryabkov warned that strengthening sanctions could lead to
“destruction of the economic system” in North Korea.
Ahead of
the emergency meeting of the UNSC on Monday, Ryabkov saidthe
“exchange
of strikes and hostile rhetoric are not leading to settlement”.
Russia
specifically referred to the insertion in the BRICS declaration on
criticism against unilateral military interventions and economic
sanctions.
“We
condemn unilateral military interventions, economic sanctions and
arbitrary use of unilateral coercive measures in violation of
international law and universally recognised norms of international
relations,” the declaration reads.
Trump
had tweeted on Sunday that his administration was considering cutting
trade ties with any country which continued to support the North
Korean regime. While China has put in place several restrictions
based on UNSC sanctions, it continues to be Pyongyang’s largest
economic partner. Besides, US-China bilateral trade volume was nearly
$580 billion last year.
On
Sunday, India had issued a statement
condemning the nuclear test, terming it as a “matter of deep
concern” that North Korea had once again acted in violation of its
international commitments. “India also remains concerned about the
proliferation of nuclear and missile technologies which has adversely
impacted India’s national security,” it said.
India
has stepped up its criticism of North Korea this year, in an effort
to be in sync with Trump’s major foreign policy priority. This
change in rhetoric was most visible in the India-US joint statement
issued when Modi visited Trump in June, compared to previous
years.
Terrorist
groups named
Meanwhile,
Indian government officials hailed the naming of Lashkar-e-Taiba
and Jaish-e-Mohammad in the BRICS declaration as a diplomatic
victory.
“For
the first time you would notice, there has been such specific listing
of such terror organisations and the fact that BRICS countries should
work together in facilitating listing of these under UNSC,” said
MEA secretary Preeti Saran in Xiamen.
The
BRICS declaration noted:
We, in this regard, express concern on the security situation in the region and violence caused by the Taliban, ISIL/DAISH, Al-Qaida and its affiliates including Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, TTP and Hizb ut-Tahrir.
The
inclusion of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan – which is based in
Pakistan and has so far, attacked the Pakistani establishment – is
certainly due to China’s insistence. After recent attacks,
Pakistani government officials have claimed that the Pakistani
Taliban, whose aims include enforcement of Sharia law, is sponsored
by India. This has been strenuously denied by New Delhi, of course.
This is
not the first time that the LeT and JeM have been named as terror
groups in a multilateral document endorsed by China.
In
December 2016, the Amritsar
Declaration at the 6th Ministerial Conference of the Heart of
Asia expressed concern over the “the gravity of the security
situation in Afghanistan in particular and the region and the high
level of violence caused by the Taliban, terrorist groups including
ISIL/DAISH and its affiliates, the Haqqani Network, Al Qaida, Islamic
Movement of Uzbekistan, East Turkistan Islamic Movement,
Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, TTP, Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, Jundullah
and other foreign terrorist fighters”.
In fact,
the Amritsar declaration was endorsed not just by China but also by
Pakistan.
Since
the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba and Jaish-e-Mohammad have been listed with the
UNSC since 2005 and 2001 respectively, it is not exactly clear
whether the naming of JeM in the BRICS declaration will help to
change China’s mind on allowing the listing of its head, Masood
Azhar.
According
to PTI,
Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang did not answer a
specific question on whether the naming of JeM marks a change in
Beijing’s stance of opposing the ban against Azhar.
The
BRICS declaration said that all countries reaffirmed their commitment
on “increasing the effectiveness of the UN counter-terrorism
framework, including in the areas of cooperation and coordination
among the relevant UN entities, designation of terrorists and
terrorist groups and technical assistance to Members States”.
Most of
the language and paragraphs on terrorism at Xiamen were a reflection
of previous declarations – from calling for effective
implementation of UNSC resolutions, cooperation in the Financial
Action Task Force (FATF), to the responsibility of states in
preventing terrorism.
We strongly condemn the recent several attacks, against some BRICS countries, including that in India. We strongly condemn terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and stressed that there can be no justification whatsoever for any acts of terrorism, whether based upon ideological, religious, political, racial, ethnic or any other reasons.
…
Stressing UN’s central role in coordinating multilateral approaches against terrorism, we urge all nations to undertake effective implementation of relevant UN Security Council Resolutions, and reaffirm our commitment on increasing the effectiveness of the UN counter terrorism framework
…
We recall the responsibility of all States to prevent terrorist actions from their territories.
…
We reaffirm our commitment to the FATF International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation and call for swift, effective and universal implementation of FATF Consolidated Strategy on Combating Terrorist Financing, including effective implementation of its operational plan. We seek to intensify our cooperation in FATF and FATF-style regional bodies (FSRBs). [Goa Declaration, 2016]
The
BRICS summit’s plenary session this year had a theme of “practical
cooperation on common development”, therefore Prime Minister
Narendra Modi’s intervention had no mention about terror, but
rather presented a “futuristic blueprint”, officials said.
But, the
Indian PM apparently raised the issue during the restricted session.
According to Saran, he proposed a BRICS initiative on
counter-terrorism and offered to host a conference on
de-radicalisation.
Share this:
The Wire – Partition at 70
A series that attempts to draw a comprehensive picture of those weeks and months when entire geographies and histories changed forever.To contribute an article to The Wire or enquire about syndication, please write to editorial@thewire.in. Make sure you follow our submission guidelines.
Copyright
All content © The Wire, unless otherwise noted or attributed.The Wire is published by the Foundation for Independent Journalism, a not-for-profit company registered under Section 8 of the Company Act, 2013.
CIN: U74140DL2015NPL285224
Acknowledgment
The
Independent and Public Spirited Media Foundation has provided
financial support to the Foundation for Independent Journalism (FIJ)
for the purpose of reporting and publishing stories of public
interest. IPSMF does not take any legal or moral responsibility
whatsoever for the content published by FIJ on their website
thewire.in or on any of its other platforms.
==//==
SOURCE/LINK:
http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/internacional/noticia/2017-09/brics-leaders-condemn-north-korea-nuclear-tests
URL:
Versão
para impressão
-
04/09/2017 16h04
-
Xiamen
President
Michel Temer expressed his concern over the recent North
Korean nuclear tests.Rogério Melo/PR
In a
statement made today (Sep 4) at the 9th BRICS summit for heads
of state in Xiamen, China, the leaders of the bloc—formed by
Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—condemned the
nuclear tests conducted by North Korea. On Sunday (3), North
Korea announced it successfully carried out a test with a
hydrogen bomb.
“We
express deep concern over the ongoing tension and prolonged
nuclear issue on the Korean peninsula and emphasize that it
should only be settled through peaceful means and direct
dialogue of all the parties concerned,” the statement reads.
Learn More
Earlier
today, during the opening ceremony of the summit, President
Michel Temer expressed his concern over the recent North
Korean nuclear tests. “The incidents in recent days
materialize fears that seemed to have stayed in History books.
Today, finding a diplomatic answer to such a serious situation
[is key],” he said.
The
president went on to note that Brazil witnessed the creation
of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, adopted
in July, “We will sign the document this month, in New York.
This is another achievement of multilateralism,” he
declared.
In
the statement, the presidents also deplored terrorist attacks
in any form and urged all nations to take measures against
terrorism, including preventing individuals from being
recruited and the blocking of sources of funding, like
organized crime and money laundering.
*The reporter traveled at the invitation of the China-Latin American and the Caribbean Press Center.
Edited by: Graça Adjuto
/ Nira Foster
Share: Facebook Google
Plus TwitterTags
Latest news
Sections
Special Reports
SOURCE/LINK:
http://ewn.co.za/2017/09/04/brics-countries-deplore-north-korean-nuclear-test-oppose-protectionism
EWN.CO.ZA - Brics countries deplore North Korean nuclear test, oppose protectionism
Brics
countries will continue to firmly oppose protectionism as they are
committed to an “open and inclusive” multilateral trading system.
FILE: North
Korea leader Kim Jong Un presides over a target strike exercise
conducted by the special operation forces of the Korean People's Army
(KPA) at an undisclosed location. Picture: AFP
Reuters
| 22 days ago
XIAMEN,
China – The nations of the Brics grouping strongly deplore North
Korea’s nuclear test but the problem over its nuclear programme
should only be settled through peaceful means and dialogue, they said
in a draft communique seen by Reuters on Monday.
In its
sixth and most powerful nuclear test on Sunday, North Korea detonated
what it said was an advanced hydrogen bomb for a long-range missile,
prompting a vow of “massive” military response from the United
States if it or its allies were threatened.
“We
express deep concern over the ongoing tension and prolonged nuclear
issue on the Korean peninsula,” the draft communique said.
A formal
communique, known as the “Xiamen Declaration”, is expected to be
issued at a meeting attended by heads of state from the five major
emerging economies in the grouping - Brazil, Russia, India, China and
South Africa - in the Chinese coastal city of Xiamen.
Brics
countries will continue to firmly oppose protectionism as they are
committed to an “open and inclusive” multilateral trading system,
the draft communique said.
It
emphasised the need to be vigilant in guarding against
“inward-looking policies” that could hurt global market
confidence, calling for Brics countries to strengthen macroeconomic
and structural policy coordination.
It also
called upon all countries to fully implement the Paris climate
agreement, while pledging to enhance Brics cooperation on climate
change and energy and to expand green financing.
The five
emerging economies agreed to jointly establish a Brics local currency
bond fund, the draft communique added.
Timeline
Popular in World
-
about 4 hours ago -
about 2 hours ago -
5 days ago -
about 3 hours ago -
about 4 hours ago -
about 4 hours ago
Comments
==//==
SOURCE/LINK:
Accessibility links
US Denies Pyongyang's Claim It's At War
With North Korea
share
USA
The United States says it
is not at war with Pyongyang.US Denies Pyongyang's Claim It's At War With North Korea
September 25, 2017 9:59 PM
FILE - In this photo taken Aug. 28,
2017, President Donald Trump speaks in the East Room of the White
House in Washington. Trump later said "all options are on the
table" in terms of a U.S. response to North Korea's launch of a
missile over Japan.
Share
"We've not declared war on North Korea," White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters on Monday. "Frankly, the suggestion is absurd."
Hours earlier, near United Nations headquarters, the North Korean foreign minister made that precise suggestion, referring to President Donald Trump's comment on Twitter that Pyongyang's regime "won't be around much longer" if the North carry out its threats.
Speaking to reporters, Ri Yong Ho said, "given the fact that this comes from someone who is currently holding the seat of United States presidency, this is clearly a declaration of war."
The foreign minister added that the United Nations and "the whole world should clearly remember that it was the U.S. who first declared war on our country."
Although North Korea has declared "war" many times in the past, now "we've entered a bona fide crisis," Van Jackson, senior lecturer in international relations at Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand, tells VOA.
"Even if we're not in a war right now, we seem to be doing everything in our power to make one happen by actions and statements that make deterrence more likely to fail," says Jackson, a former director for Korea policy and a defense strategy advisor at the U.S. Defense Department.
Ri warned that his country might shoot down U.S. strategic bombers, even if they are not in North Korean airspace.
A fighter jet from North Korea in 1969 shot down an unarmed U.S. Navy reconnaissance plane, outside North Korean territorial airspace in the Sea of Japan, killing 30 sailors and one marine on board.
Avoiding a war
Speaking at a security conference on Monday, National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster said the United States hopes to avoid war with North Korea "but what we can't do is discount that possibility."
The Army Lt. General added that the U.S. has thought through several different ways the problem with North Korea could be resolved and "some are uglier than others."
McMaster, told the conference hosted by the Institute for the Study of War, however, "there's not a precision strike that solves the problem."
One peaceful solution, according to McMaster, would be for Pyongyang to give access to inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency. But any diplomatic negotiations, McMaster said, would "have to happen under conditions that are different from previous talks." He said, however, he was not going to come up with a list of pre-conditions.
Some analysts see the path to talks still running through Beijing, which recently moved to cut banking ties between China and North Korea, as well as shutting off the supply of liquefied natural gas to the North Koreans and stopping imports of their textiles.
"I think that the Chinese are sending a signal to the North that they are skating on thin ice," says T.J. Pempel, a political science professor at University of California, Berkeley.
Threats from North Korea
The North Korean foreign minister threatened on Saturday that his country could conduct an atmospheric hydrogen bomb test over the Pacific Ocean.
U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis responded Monday that if North Korea carried out its threat, "This would be a shocking display of irresponsibility toward global health, toward stability, toward non-proliferation."
U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancer bombers from Guam escorted by F-16 fighter jets from a U.S. base in Japan on Saturday, flew in international airspace over waters east of North Korea.
The Pentagon says the show of force, meant to display some of the military options available to President Trump, was "the farthest north of the demilitarized zone any U.S. fighter or bomber aircraft have flown off North Korea's coast in the 21st century."
Pempel, at Berkeley, tells VOA he does not see the North Koreans, despite their amplified bellicose rhetoric, eager to go to war.
The North Koreans know, Pempel says, that a war "will ultimately lead to the destruction of the regime."
Describing North Korean leader Kim Jong Un as "Rocket Man" on a suicide mission, Trump used his maiden address to the U.N. General Assembly last Tuesday to warn Pyongyang that its current course could lead to "total destruction."
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, in an unusual signed statement, called Trump a "dotard" expressing "mentally deranged behavior."
-
Steve Herman is VOA's White House Bureau Chief.
Subscribe
THE
END
Your opinion